Blansky
3147
I've had both and only kept the Tank. I love both designs but I think....
that there are wearability issues for some people with the flat backing of the reverse not sitting that well on the wrist. But I would guess that may have to do with the size/model that was purchased.
The Reverso does seem to be also a bit of a scratch magnet, although I love the art deco look of it.
So for me both the Tank and Reverso are watches with a number of designs and styles that I'd gladly own.
One other thing is that since both are rectangular, a watch shape that is less popular that round, you will see fewer of either out in the wild.
Cartier Tank vs JLC Reverso — Icons with Different Souls.
Both the Cartier Tank and the Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso occupy rare air — long-standing icons with deep roots, unmistakable silhouettes, and loyal collector followings. But beyond their rectangular forms and art deco lineage, I’ve often felt these two watc...
So hard to say; both are great icons!
For me, the Art Deco lines of the Reverso really speak to me much more than the Cartier. I really like the Cartier, but the Reverso just feels more special to me. Je ne sais quoi. I don't know why I like the Reverso more, but I just do!
Both have a great history and will continue to be classic choices.
To me a basic non date gold Cartier Tank is slightly more the conservative choice. A flamboyant person may choose the Reverso. But either will be winners.
Interesting take
I hadn’t thought of it through the lens of personality types. Do you think the different strap/dial options today blur those lines a bit, or does the Tank still feel like the more understated choice no matter what?
Interesting question
I have owned both and liked wearing them both. I have read a study on what is driving us when we buy for example a watch, pen or a car is: -design -brand -engineering In that order. To put it simple, we choose with our heart and justify with our head. I h...
That’s a really insightful framework
Design, brand, engineering. I agree Cartier is more universally recognized, while JLC feels a bit more niche among collectors. Did you find that people outside the watch world reacted differently when you wore each one?
Thinking about your question
a general observation is that I very seldom get a comment about the watch I am wearing. Does not matter if I am in Sweden or abroad. I can sense that people sometimes look at my watch especially when you sit close like in a bar or in an aircraft but rarel...
They are both truly beautiful in their own ways and iconic for good reason.
I have owned various Cartier Tanks over time but never a Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso, and that Cartier Tank a Vis you posted is breathtaking to me. Although I am trying very hard to not get anymore watches if the right Cartier Tank appeared I feel it would b...
The Tank à Vis really does have a special charm
Especially within the CPCP collection. If you were to try a Reverso, do you think you’d lean toward a classic model, or something like a Duoface or complication to differentiate it more from your Tank experience?
I really don't know I really like them but I just never pulled the trigger on one there was always something else I wanted more,
As for which model, I think that may have been part of the problem as I really do like so many of them and that makes choosing just one harder. Usually something just catches my attention and then it's mine, not very planned or organised but has served me...
Great question ! Undeniably two of the most iconic rectangular watches.
I am blessed to have both (Classic medium Reverso and Rose Gold Tank Louis). They will stay on the collection. The Reverso is more sporty with a bit of elegance coming from the dial. As such, I can wear it in almost any outfit, from suite to TShirt with j...
Perfectly said
The Reverso almost straddles the line with a Santos, while the Tank Louis Cartier lives fully in the dress/elegance world. Out of curiosity, do you find yourself reaching more often for one or the other, or do they serve such different roles that both get...
I love both if them, but Reverso got worn 75 while Tank only 25
Because reverso is more versatile. And now i am rarely wear formal suit except when going to church. That's why the Tank now get wrist time on my wife's wrist most of the time. I love to see when she is among lots of other ladies wearing rolex...the Tank ...
Hi hoseachandra. Some weeks ago JLC presented a “new” midsize monoface reverso.
I went to the AD to try it and I liked it but it was a bit small for my big wrist. The size is 24.4mm width x 40.1mm length x 7.56mm thick. Is this the size of yours? I see it perfect on your wrist. Source: monochrome watches This is the model I am talkin...
No, mine is the previous generation of mid-size
The size is 25.2 x 42.3. A bit bigger than the new one. I think the new size is fine for most of wrist. The bigger size or "tribute" size is definitely wears much bigger at 27 x 45 mm.
Thanks for the feedback. I would have preferred
the size of yours but I am going to buy it anyway. Best:
Outstanding question! Outstanding question! My OCD has taken me down the reverso path however I’m totally in love with the tank Louis
I find the Cartier to be more demure, sophisticated, and elegant. However, I love the sporting nature in the history of the reverso.
I like how you frame it.
The Tank as the more demure and elegant choice, the Reverso as carrying that sporting history.
Very intereting post, talking about these two
In my own personal choice, the Reverso wins hands down. The first time I saw a Reverso Duo at a boutique, my jaw dropped to the floor in awe, seeing that dial being flipped to the reverse side. There is nothing more entertaining than showing the reverse s...
That makes sense
The Santos does give you that Cartier design language but with a bit more wrist presence. Have you ever tried the larger Tank Américaine or Tank MC? I wonder if those might strike a balance for someone who finds the classic Tanks too slight.
JLC Duoface Grande Taille & Tank Louis Cartier
This is a set of interesting questions. I have thought about them before (which led to the consequences seen below...)(!). First, I don't wear rectangular watches as much these days. But if I have to pick one, the two-in-one JLC would be my top choice. I ...
Really valuable perspective.
Especially since you’ve lived through both ownership and service experiences. Interesting too that the Tank you had carried a JLC movement at its heart. It raises a good question: does sharing movements between maisons dilute the individuality, or is it j...
IMO, not in this case...
...because Cartier 'uses' movements from other makers as a jewelry-focus company, and on the other hand, JLC is a titan in movement manufacture and these are supplied to other brands as a hallmark of distinction and reliability. I just could not figure ou...
I've had both and only kept the Tank. I love both designs but I think....
that there are wearability issues for some people with the flat backing of the reverse not sitting that well on the wrist. But I would guess that may have to do with the size/model that was purchased. The Reverso does seem to be also a bit of a scratch ma...
You’re right
The Reverso’s flat back and polished case do make it more sensitive to both comfort and scratches. I suppose Cartier’s Tanks, being slightly more curved and often smaller, sidestep that issue. Out of curiosity, which Tank variant did you end up keeping? ...
I kept this rather entry level version...Tank Solo.
I kind of wish I'd gone the extra mile and bought a guilloche dial version. ...
Have not owned either one so far…
Some thoughts still. These are probably the only two non round watches that have sold consistently well - it is an exceedingly difficult part of the market. I like the design, brand, mechanics framework mentioned above and looking at it this way I recon C...
You’re right.
They are different-very different-despite both being rectangular when you take in the brancards for the two. Two things lead me to prefer the Reverso. First, it is a true Art Deco design-especially when the dial has hour markers instead of numerals. Secon...