xto
1669
given the nominal purpose, i think enamel is better for on-the-spot readability (vs silver for aesthetics)
Breguet Chronograph Ref 5247: Enamel or Guilloché?
Enamel for me, even if the guilloché is sumptuous. I damn love it. One day, with a bit of luck. Best, Nicolas ...
Difficult…
I’d tend to go for the guilloché, but those Breguet numerals on the enamel dial are a sight to behold as well. It’s a tie for me.
Not a fan of that tachometer on the dial
To me it ruins the dial So I would pick an older reference Among these 2 probably the guilloché…. While both are nice ( well without the spiral ) guilloché is just more typical for breguet
Enamel. This and the Réveil du Tsar in grand feu are just magnificent: the numerals, the legibility, the fine detail...hard to beat.
I find Breguet's beautiful guilloché work more effective on simpler dials.
For this reference, definitely the enamel
The weird spiraling red tachy scale looks spectacular on the flat white surface, but looks weird and disjointed on the guilloche dial. That doesn't go for every reference, though! As fabulous as the enamel looks on the 5177, I went with this instead: ...
I had this same debate not long ago at the Boutique!
Ended up choosing the enamel due to perceived harder to make and legibility factor.
Enamel dial for me
It has a certain charm and is a standout between the two instantly. Best Gatsby
99 pcnt of the time, for Breguet, i would prefer
Guilloche. In this case, actually prefer enamel
Enamel 🥰
The guilloche design is so beautiful and typical for Breguet, but it doesn't work at all on this chronograph 😢
oops in that i posted what i previously posted without realizing i posted it.
So i erased that text from the post and posted "oops" as in.... Anywho... if you read this far and expanded this posting....enjoy the music ❤️
Load More Comments >>