The new Freak X revealed

Jan 13, 2019,02:29 AM
 

Hands-on review here:

monochrome-watches.com

Curious to read UN fans' thoughts. Would you still call it a Freak?







Source monochrome


  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

If someone had tried to make a Freak knock-off...

 
 By: iadxb : January 13th, 2019-03:51
...by modifying an ordinary watch movement, this is probably what he would come up with. I was saddened to see this coming from UN themselves

Have to agree

 
 By: manilx : January 13th, 2019-04:44
Nothing freakish anymore here. Just milking the cow.

Freak that is not freak anymore... sadly

 
 By: Ares501 - Mr Green : January 13th, 2019-02:54
Cheers D

Great question Ronald

 
 By: iadxb : January 13th, 2019-08:51
I will try to explain, but I am not at all qualified to write detailed explanations on watch mechanisms; so any comments, additions and corrections by fellow Purists are most welcome. Perhaps it is easier to start with the similarities between Freak X and... 

The problem with the watch is the name. A "Freak" can never have a crown.

 
 By: MichaelC : January 13th, 2019-05:58
If we could go back in time, and this watch could have launched before the real Freak, it might have been a nice precursor of what was to come. But that would have reduced the impact of the real Freak, which was one of the most industry-shattering launche... 

Thank you for the comment Michael

 
 By: iadxb : January 13th, 2019-09:44
No doubt that Freak X required some serious engineering effort to realize, and is aesthetically interesting watch. I for one would have had no issue if the brand has presented this as a more accessible 'tribute' to the Freak while at the same time present... 

I’m afraid I must respectfully disagree with your last point...

 
 By: Moana43 : January 13th, 2019-10:03
On its website, UN is very straightforward about what the Freak X is and isn’t. I think it’s being presented as an entrée into the Freak zone, if you will — while being clear that it is not a full-on Freak. I think that’s very fair. Looked at a bit differ... 

Good for UN!

 
 By: Moana43 : January 13th, 2019-07:19
Rather than look at it for what it isn’t, I’m inclined to look at it for what it is. Viewed on its own, I think this is a great development, and makes an interesting technical approach and aesthetic available at a lower price point. I’ll be taking a close... 

Good take on this piece, Moana43.

 
 By: M4 : January 17th, 2019-06:32
I'm coming around to the same view. M4

I actually like it but I need to see it in the metal

 
 By: Mohannad (aka Riddler) : January 13th, 2019-10:20
If I like it then I will get one

Interesting comments. I must say that I am still true to the original concept of the Freak because that was truly an original concept.

 
 By: Mitch K : January 13th, 2019-12:23
Interestingly, several weeks ago I was working with someone who was wearing a watch that had the outward appearance of a Freak but had a crown and was a clear knock off. Now I see a watch that looks similar to that one. I didn't inspect the watch when I s... 

Let's hope that UN continues to add to that thrilling list Mitch

 
 By: iadxb : January 13th, 2019-21:09
They seems to have given this SIHH a pass, but perhaps later in the year or next... Fingers crossed

Cool looking...

 
 By: keks : January 15th, 2019-10:45
But a freak it ain’t... and should not be called what it is not.

Not a Freak, but . . .

 
 By: M4 : January 17th, 2019-06:31
. . . I'm liking it more and more. M4