WatchProSite|Market|Digest

TimeOut

The same holds true for the engineering departments unfortunately...

 

I've been calling it for about 15 years now, and this is my opinion of course:
At most places I've worked, you have a bell curve distribution. A smattering of trainees you can absorb, the bulk of staff are junior to mid, and then a small amount of senior staff.
What has happened now is that to truly be effective, it's no longer enough to be a specialist, you have to have 2 specialties plus be able to function as an integrator to actually function as a senior technologist. I don't mean in the sense of "I have a title", I mean in the practical sense of "I'm advising on technology policy with 10-20 year national implications."
What does this mean for staff? The bell curve has inverted, you need MORE senior staff, what used to be the "mids" are either people crossing the gulf to become seniors or people that can't keep up and falling back to become juniors. I tell people that tech is a river not a lake and you have to swim hard just to stay still, even harder to advance.
I've watched people that 10+ years ago were "lead engineers" suddenly find themselves doing routine work and wondering what happened to their career while others advanced. I've also seen others that despite their age keep continuously learning (We had a 40 year employee "grandma" famous for that, total rockstar)
As for the blue collar stuff, I remember in 1994/5, I remember seeing hardwired systems using military HUD displays designed for field hardware troubleshooting for mechanics. The goal at the time was to eliminate the need for the military to send people to training schools for months/years and get them into the field right away. Even back then the systems were amazing, the limiting factor was the technology and portability. Those issues have now been fixed.

  login to reply