eric.vonschonberg
403
it's not; debate is for subjective matters
The *fact* that tourbillons provide no improvement in accuracy in a
wristwatch is not a subjective matter open to debate. Debate is
for subjective matters, such as aesthetics.
It's a good thing that objective things that can be measured are not
debated. If they were, we would have members of congress debating
how much pi (3.14159...) should be, or how fast the speed of light
should be.
Eric von Schonberg
A few comments...
By: asg : September 24th, 2008-14:16
Hi Eric, Thank you for your candor - its nice that we can have this type of dialogue here.... Regarding your comments about a tourbillon being for "dress watches" - I dont disagree, but it has to do with the total overall asthetic of the watch. To me, the...
Tourbillons
By: Elbow : September 25th, 2008-05:01
I can't think of a more useless complication than a minute repeater, unless you happen to be blind or live at the north pole. As I understand it, most everyday tourbillons are still OEM'd by a small number of workshops that supply many of the brands that ...
Thanks!
By: matayanant : September 28th, 2008-10:12
Thanks for the info regarding Tourbillion . I wasn't aware that not only the feature itself isn't quite necessary, but it's also fragile. This info save me a bundle of money from having to pay for something that I don't need.
Thank you all...
By: asg : September 24th, 2008-13:41
I appreciate the advice and insight. Its nice to get the insight of a wide variety of collectors. At least everyone on this board isn't afraid to give a real opinion. I agree to an extent about the chrono being "race inspired" - but take a step back...its...