WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Patek Philippe

Nicolas, I think you may miss the point

 

When the Nautilus was launched in 1976 it was clearly not a Patek, at all either at that time. But today, would someone say they shouldn't have done it? Of course not.

I think I tried to explain is precisely that there are new pieces and especially new designs that are introduced and about which we must ask ourselves "is it going to be the right move when we'll be able to judge in 20 years from now?". Of course I don't have a crystal ball and am not a specialist of design but I think that this watch has many elements showing it may likely become a future hit lin-up (which elements I already detailed). Not because it is labelled Patek but beacause it is charming, coherent and so tasteful.

The style of the hands, markers etc are clearly not 1930's-1940's classical (and should not be) but 1960's classical. The direction and characteristics are totally different.

I would not like to have a modern version of other brands but I think this one comes out clearly and is not a copy of Group brands brands we see too often these days.

But, the rest is pure aesthetics matter of course, we all have our background and everybody will certainly not like it that way. That's why I understand you feeling as this is clearly not your thing.

Thanks for you input.

Cheers, Mark

  login to reply
💰1729 Marketplace Listings for Patek Philippe