Gus7
493
Great review FX!
Jun 21, 2020,19:07 PM
I think there are some really interesting observations made in your review and ones which I share, both in terms of criticisms as well as optimism.
You state, 'But the ambition assigned to the Calatrava 6007A-001 may be broader. It also aims to rejuvenate the image of Patek Philippe. I almost wrote "to renew the clientele" but I changed my mind.' I completely agree with this. While this is not a watch that appeals to me as a PP collector I undoubtedly understand the objective of PP in releasing this. So rather than focussing on the points of contention one should applaud the efforts at increasing its customer base to a newer, younger demographic. To that end, I actually rather hope that us 'collectors' aren't allocated these pieces as if it is to serve its presumed purpose it should be going to new customers of the brand as a means of widening their future clientele base. That would be better than it sitting somewhere in a safe to be sold at a profit without having been loved.
How much better the thought that someone who has lusted after a PP for years and is now finally able to be in a financial position to fulfil a dream could start their journey with a piece like this?
Thank you for the review.
Final point? I note that in your photographs as with pretty much every single review I've seen the hands are in the same position with the second hand at 30. Why so? Was it a non-working prototype you handled? I'm intrigued!
Comments:
view entire thread
Hands on review of the Patek Philippe Calatrava 6007A-001
By: foversta : June 21st, 2020-11:23
The wait had become very long and watch enthusiasts were impatient. The health context and the cancellation of the 2020 edition of Baselworld had prevented Patek Philippe from presenting any new product since the start of the year. And then on June 18 cam...
Wonderful review and examination as usual, Fx... thank you!🙏
By: Brandon Skinner : June 21st, 2020-11:41
I think the concept that a Patek crafted in steel is rare can be put to rest. Historically perhaps, but to me the future will bring many more steel references to market... which in my view there is nothing wrong with. A nice enough watch that will surely ...
Great review!!
By: sham1 : June 21st, 2020-12:10
I have read every review on this watch and yours was the most balanced and I like your view points on the direction of Patek Philippe. Excellent photos as usual Xavier I await to see if my application for a piece has been approved.
Great review. Thanks FX !
By: dms : June 21st, 2020-12:13
I totally agree with the display case back and the marking being a big no. A solid case back or a celebration marking on the edge of a display case back would have been much better. As for the date, it does not bother me that much, even though I agree it ...
Thanks a lot for an informative review.
By: xyz123abc : June 21st, 2020-12:40
Very interesting to read and I agree on both the date (better without) and the (laser?) etching on the glass back. I can understand why PP sticks to the proven movement in this model (development cost depreciated). All in all, thank you for a good review....
Thanks!
By: 997c4gts : June 21st, 2020-13:48
For a lovely review to balance all the internet traffic on this. PP were looking to revitalise/modernise the Calatrava line for 2020 and it will be interesting to see if this style does stand the test of time with new models for the regular catalogue. Qui...
Thank you Fx. Wonderful review with a number of logical perspectives
By: emcquillan : June 21st, 2020-14:26
Your photos give the watch life. Not my cup of tea, but I appreciate Patek Philippe’s approach to an evolving clientele and lifestyle. The date and gap between the strap and case are obvious imperfections, but very subjectively the one that doesn’t do it ...
well sir , that was the most balanced report on the new 6006 to date
By: watch-guy.com : June 21st, 2020-14:28
I am still unsure as my feelings, ambivalent to be sure On the one hand - a new SS Patek , "limited" edition to celebrate a milestone in their history On the other - a rather bland copy cat watch with no real Patek DNA But I agree with everyone., it will ...
😂👍👍 [nt]
By: FabR : June 22nd, 2020-13:16
Thanks for your review, Fx.
By: Pretty Boy : June 21st, 2020-15:10
I like the watch, and the date window doesn’t bother me at all. I’m a bit disappointed with the use of the 324SC movement and case-back solution though. Best, V.
Superb and concise review!
By: Patekfinity : June 21st, 2020-15:19
I, too, placed an order and hope will be approved for this marvelous watch. Did you notice the decagon on the caseback? Sort of a homage to the Nautilus I think. Definitely like you said this is a new and younger looking timepiece. Many detractors upon in...
Always, we have to ask, if it was not a PATEK...
By: Mostel : June 21st, 2020-15:30
Foversta, you are a treasure!! so grateful and appreciative for your incisive review. OK... And so I ask that question... even though it has no impact probably on anything... the mad rush (presumably) to collect this watch is 100% about that it IS a PATEK...
🎯
By: Brandon Skinner : June 21st, 2020-22:35
Nailed it
I always feel that Patek enjoys....
By: Mostel : June 21st, 2020-17:48
a level of 'forgiveness' that no other brand receives... ( arguably Rolex but Rolex steel watches are priced relatively market based) in a world of Facebook and Instagram... it is possible that Patek may face the brutal sobering reality... that a watch li...
Great review FX!
By: Gus7 : June 21st, 2020-19:07
I think there are some really interesting observations made in your review and ones which I share, both in terms of criticisms as well as optimism. You state, 'But the ambition assigned to the Calatrava 6007A-001 may be broader. It also aims to rejuvenate...
Thanks for the review.
By: Wristenthusiast : June 21st, 2020-20:39
I agree with your case back comment. I love seeing the movement personally. But either make it solid or transparent , not a distorted view. By other person issue is watches that display a 6 and a 9 but rotate them too much ( rolex has models with an upsid...
Great Review Great Pics!
By: unicorn : June 21st, 2020-23:13
Thank You! Your insights on Patek's strategic intent is well examined - youth, elegance, versatility. I have a bit reserve on accessibility given the price tag, though that could have been part of the overall thinking i.e. true elite accessibility. To pus...
Thank you for the review, Francois-Xavier
By: Boris : June 21st, 2020-23:56
I enjoyed the excellent writing and pictures, which are of the usual highest standards. Now, onto the watch itself: I find this an extremely lazy / complacent effort from Patek. The design is as uninspired as the price is ludicrous for a simple stainless ...
Love the in-depth review of the watch!
By: KC_HK : June 22nd, 2020-04:17
I would agree the price point of the watch is accessible, however, allocation is not! So, the conclusion is that this is an “inaccessible” piece! 🤣🤣🤣
Well written and thoughtful review
By: WatchAl : June 22nd, 2020-09:57
I had an initial dislike for the date window, but thought it could grow on me (wishful thinking). After a phone call with my AD I was told the demand is EXTREMELY high. The next disappointment for me was the text on the case back glass. Not something that...
Great review FX!
By: keks : June 23rd, 2020-04:57
Thanks for sharing your views, well written and balanced as always. Personally I have yet to digest this release. Perhaps I will appreciate it more once I see it in the real however for now I am on the sidelines personally. Reasons? - I am a huge fan of t...