Jester[RD Moderator]
2636
Where do we go from here?
Craig's post regarding PAM26 vs. PAM317 got me thinking: How and if we, fellow collectors/fans of Panerai, would evolve, in terms of perceived quality of the brand?

I'm a complication freak as I often weight my purchase by calculating cost per complication! Yet, I still found myself possessing excessive amount of Panerai time only watches with no complication whatsoever. Obviously the design elements kept sucking me back in and I'm sure it's the same for most collectors.
Having been obsessed by the brand for a decade now, I noticed good portion of the collectors follow similar patterns:
Start w/ contemporary Luminor, 40mm/44mm, then onto iconic time only special edition pieces like 127/217/232/249, then perhaps some neo vendome classics like A-B series T-dial PAM1, 4, 9 etc. Next stop would obviously be the pre-vendome pieces and some would venture all the way to vintage pieces and grail pieces like PAM21/203. One thing for sure, complication is surely not on their mind when it comes to Panerai given the historical heritage and the design DNA. BUT would this ever change?
For me, I found it difficult to shell out significant amount of money for a vintage Panerai pieces with basic rolex movement when I can use the fund toward a minute repeater or similarly complicated pieces from PP/AP/Breguet. Instead I would have immense interest at the new Panerai w/ interesting complication/movement development.
panerai.watchprosite.com
While I believe they're still at the stage of drawing out a fine balance between functionality vs. design I think OP are certainly well on their way there, case in point would be the PAM341, drawing the DNA from the history while packaging the in-house 8 day power reserve moment.
Well, that's just me... What do you think? This message has been edited by Jester on 2009-04-11 11:41:13 This message has been edited by AnthonyTsai on 2009-04-14 07:08:24
Available on the marketplace
1,817 Panerai listings are live on the eBay market and 1415 collector listings on the WatchProSite marketplace.

Review
AnthonyTsai · Dec 9, 2009
Anthony Tsai reviews the Panerai PAM305 Luminor 1950 Submersible. Discover its 47mm titanium case, unique dial, and Paneristi appeal.
50 replies56196 views

Discussion
AnthonyTsai · May 15, 2025
Explore a 2008 interview with Panerai CEO Angelo Bonati, discussing the brand's unique market position, large watch trend, and future vision. Insights from WatchProSite collectors.
34 replies17881 views

Community
AnthonyTsai · Sep 17, 2011
Recap of PuristSPro Panerai dinner events in NYC & LA. AnthonyTsai shares insights on the unique collector community and SIHH 2011 novelties.
34 replies28985 views

New Release
AnthonyTsai · Jan 23, 2009
Explore Panerai's SIHH 2009 new models and the debut of the P.9000 in-house movement. Detailed overview of PAM312, PAM328, PAM305, PAM320, PAM329, and their features.
19 replies27393 views

Review
BluNotte · Jul 31, 2010
First live shots and updated specs of the Panerai PAM341 L'Egiziano. Discover its 100m water resistance, plexi crystal, and real-world wearability.
57 replies25410 views

Collection
Subexplorer · Jan 2, 2017
Explore the Panerai PAM341 Egiziano, a 60mm titanium watch. Collectors debate its wearability, historical significance, and 'state of mind' appeal.
43 replies11299 views
Where do we go from here?
By: Jester : April 10th, 2009-21:08
Craig's post regarding PAM26 vs. PAM317 got me thinking: How and if we, fellow collectors/fans of Panerai, would evolve, in terms of perceived quality of the brand? I'm a complication freak as I often weight my purchase by calculating cost per complicatio...
tout d'accord...
By: Jester : April 11th, 2009-12:15
With a rich history behind, I think it's a pretty daunting job to try to come up with something horologically interesting while maintaining the DNA. It doesn't happen often but when it does, I love the results.
My dear Nicolas...
By: Jester : April 11th, 2009-12:34
While I agree and I think Panerai is exactly doing what you were inferring to in your post: -#1 Developing historically correct models to appeal to the die hard old schooler like 232, 249... -#2 coming up with broader products with wider appeal to larger ...
No problem for me, Jester, if a new " in house " movement
By: amanico : April 11th, 2009-14:01
In house movement is used in the category 3...unless it serves a complication ala tourbillon, or a GMT + 8 Days, + Power Reserve + GTI + Turbo + 16 Valves, ... LOLOL As for the Luminor Chrono, some are very nice, even if historically non correct, as, for ...
Just an opinion
By: Guille : April 11th, 2009-23:45
This is a very good topic. Up to the early 2000s Panerai offered a product that was authentic to its original heritage, and incredibly accessible. Anyone from around the early days has observed the inevitable evolution of our loved Brand. Evolution being ...
To a certain extent
By: Jester : April 14th, 2009-21:11
I agree with you. Frankly I'm not a big fan of, for example the date window, on the dial, especially those under the magnifier. Yet we still see some models, in my mind, being perfectly historically correct, yet they're largely neglected by collectors. PA...
value for money
By: gcTIME : April 14th, 2009-12:20
i see the point about movement finish and agree. however, looking at this from another angle, would it be more justified to pay 20K for a ROO with a common JLC based movement with "standard" movement finish or 10K for a 233 with a completely in house manu...
It is true
By: gcTIME : April 14th, 2009-19:45
Anthony, you were right. I should have used MSRPs for both. But my point remains that, IMHO, it is more justified to pay 14K for a 233 with manufacture movement (8-days, GMT, day/night indicator) than to pay 19K for a ROO with a common JLC based movement ...
Agree that
By: Jester : April 14th, 2009-21:20
Panerai might still have some distance to go before they can attract the likes of high end collector who's been buying from the big three but my original question is for those core collector who's been buying vintage/pre-vendome/early vendome pieces. Some...
i agree and understand fully
By: gcTIME : April 17th, 2009-08:37
where you are coming from. only panerai/richmont will know whether they have done the right thing in the long run, from a commercial/brand equity point of view. but one thing for sure, it appears, is that with the manufacture movements and deviation from ...