AnthonyTsai[PuristS]
22366
The pricing you're using is not consistent
Because you're not using retail pricing on both models. Full retail on a ROO is around $18k or $19k? A PAM233 retail is almost $14k.
And btw, the new model Offshores are starting to all house the in-house AP chrono movement 3120, so both models in comparison house in-house movements
If Panerai decides to choose the less elaborate tool-like finishing, they need to adjust pricing to reflect this lower grade finishing. Otherwise, the disparity between retail price and secondary market prices will grow larger.
Cheers,
Anthony
Available on the marketplace
1,835 Panerai listings are live on the eBay market and 1415 collector listings on the WatchProSite marketplace.
Where do we go from here?
By: Jester : April 10th, 2009-21:08
Craig's post regarding PAM26 vs. PAM317 got me thinking: How and if we, fellow collectors/fans of Panerai, would evolve, in terms of perceived quality of the brand? I'm a complication freak as I often weight my purchase by calculating cost per complicatio...
tout d'accord...
By: Jester : April 11th, 2009-12:15
With a rich history behind, I think it's a pretty daunting job to try to come up with something horologically interesting while maintaining the DNA. It doesn't happen often but when it does, I love the results.
My dear Nicolas...
By: Jester : April 11th, 2009-12:34
While I agree and I think Panerai is exactly doing what you were inferring to in your post: -#1 Developing historically correct models to appeal to the die hard old schooler like 232, 249... -#2 coming up with broader products with wider appeal to larger ...
No problem for me, Jester, if a new " in house " movement
By: amanico : April 11th, 2009-14:01
In house movement is used in the category 3...unless it serves a complication ala tourbillon, or a GMT + 8 Days, + Power Reserve + GTI + Turbo + 16 Valves, ... LOLOL As for the Luminor Chrono, some are very nice, even if historically non correct, as, for ...
Just an opinion
By: Guille : April 11th, 2009-23:45
This is a very good topic. Up to the early 2000s Panerai offered a product that was authentic to its original heritage, and incredibly accessible. Anyone from around the early days has observed the inevitable evolution of our loved Brand. Evolution being ...
To a certain extent
By: Jester : April 14th, 2009-21:11
I agree with you. Frankly I'm not a big fan of, for example the date window, on the dial, especially those under the magnifier. Yet we still see some models, in my mind, being perfectly historically correct, yet they're largely neglected by collectors. PA...
value for money
By: gcTIME : April 14th, 2009-12:20
i see the point about movement finish and agree. however, looking at this from another angle, would it be more justified to pay 20K for a ROO with a common JLC based movement with "standard" movement finish or 10K for a 233 with a completely in house manu...
It is true
By: gcTIME : April 14th, 2009-19:45
Anthony, you were right. I should have used MSRPs for both. But my point remains that, IMHO, it is more justified to pay 14K for a 233 with manufacture movement (8-days, GMT, day/night indicator) than to pay 19K for a ROO with a common JLC based movement ...
Agree that
By: Jester : April 14th, 2009-21:20
Panerai might still have some distance to go before they can attract the likes of high end collector who's been buying from the big three but my original question is for those core collector who's been buying vintage/pre-vendome/early vendome pieces. Some...
i agree and understand fully
By: gcTIME : April 17th, 2009-08:37
where you are coming from. only panerai/richmont will know whether they have done the right thing in the long run, from a commercial/brand equity point of view. but one thing for sure, it appears, is that with the manufacture movements and deviation from ...