Guille
229
Just an opinion
This is a very good topic.
Up to the early 2000s Panerai offered a product that was authentic to its original heritage, and incredibly accessible. Anyone from around the early days has observed the inevitable evolution of our loved Brand. Evolution being the kindest word, in some cases explotaition being more adroit. But what is a Richemont Brand to do, but to extend the confines of its offerings to the greatest limits of its possible demand. Surely a newly minted millionaire in Russia or China, or anywhere would want a nifty Tourbillon?
One way to consider this evolution is to think that it happened, or was driven by a unique time of excess, now coming to an end.
I am mostly interested in what Panerai will do now. Its concept seemingly perfect for times of authenticity, simplicity and austere elegance. The future of complicated Panerai's (by horology's standards) doesn't look too good. I am also mostly unmotivated by the hybrid models like the 233 that marry many of the Brand's elements into one roof. These watches with their Manifattura engines seem to be mostly incremental offerings, one day an 8 day manual, the next a 10 day auto, tomorrow?
Still I think that the Laboratoy of idee is a philosophy that will find the true authentic evolution now that the Brand has some time to breathe, perhaps be more introspective?
Just an opinion.
Available on the marketplace
1,835 Panerai listings are live on the eBay market and 1415 collector listings on the WatchProSite marketplace.
Where do we go from here?
By: Jester : April 10th, 2009-21:08
Craig's post regarding PAM26 vs. PAM317 got me thinking: How and if we, fellow collectors/fans of Panerai, would evolve, in terms of perceived quality of the brand? I'm a complication freak as I often weight my purchase by calculating cost per complicatio...
tout d'accord...
By: Jester : April 11th, 2009-12:15
With a rich history behind, I think it's a pretty daunting job to try to come up with something horologically interesting while maintaining the DNA. It doesn't happen often but when it does, I love the results.
My dear Nicolas...
By: Jester : April 11th, 2009-12:34
While I agree and I think Panerai is exactly doing what you were inferring to in your post: -#1 Developing historically correct models to appeal to the die hard old schooler like 232, 249... -#2 coming up with broader products with wider appeal to larger ...
No problem for me, Jester, if a new " in house " movement
By: amanico : April 11th, 2009-14:01
In house movement is used in the category 3...unless it serves a complication ala tourbillon, or a GMT + 8 Days, + Power Reserve + GTI + Turbo + 16 Valves, ... LOLOL As for the Luminor Chrono, some are very nice, even if historically non correct, as, for ...
Just an opinion
By: Guille : April 11th, 2009-23:45
This is a very good topic. Up to the early 2000s Panerai offered a product that was authentic to its original heritage, and incredibly accessible. Anyone from around the early days has observed the inevitable evolution of our loved Brand. Evolution being ...
To a certain extent
By: Jester : April 14th, 2009-21:11
I agree with you. Frankly I'm not a big fan of, for example the date window, on the dial, especially those under the magnifier. Yet we still see some models, in my mind, being perfectly historically correct, yet they're largely neglected by collectors. PA...
value for money
By: gcTIME : April 14th, 2009-12:20
i see the point about movement finish and agree. however, looking at this from another angle, would it be more justified to pay 20K for a ROO with a common JLC based movement with "standard" movement finish or 10K for a 233 with a completely in house manu...
It is true
By: gcTIME : April 14th, 2009-19:45
Anthony, you were right. I should have used MSRPs for both. But my point remains that, IMHO, it is more justified to pay 14K for a 233 with manufacture movement (8-days, GMT, day/night indicator) than to pay 19K for a ROO with a common JLC based movement ...
Agree that
By: Jester : April 14th, 2009-21:20
Panerai might still have some distance to go before they can attract the likes of high end collector who's been buying from the big three but my original question is for those core collector who's been buying vintage/pre-vendome/early vendome pieces. Some...
i agree and understand fully
By: gcTIME : April 17th, 2009-08:37
where you are coming from. only panerai/richmont will know whether they have done the right thing in the long run, from a commercial/brand equity point of view. but one thing for sure, it appears, is that with the manufacture movements and deviation from ...