gerald.d
140
This is just weird
Apr 03, 2018,14:04 PM
“Second, I think you probably can comment on my third point above”
No I can’t.
I have literally, empirically, zero knowledge on the matter.
Your insinuation that I do so is defamatory.
You are going to hide behind an anonymous Internet forum handle and accuse me of lying?
Think yourself lucky that I’m not the litigious type.
And as for the LF minute repeater movement.
The movement clearly - unless you want to propose a redefinition of the word - has never been used before.
But let me be generous, and assume that what you actually mean is the high level architecture of the movement.
You state that it has been used “so many times before”.
Care to list those “so many times”?
Yes - it is clear that the high level structure and design would appear to be identical to that of the GP reference thet has been shared here.
So let us, for the sake of argument, go along with your definition of “movement”.
On which references has it been used “so many times before”?