I agree with the watch being a less than innovative entry in the luxury sports segment, borrowing heavily from the Nautilus. As I wrote in response to FabR, I believe this is true for many recent sports watches. I agree 100% the Royal Oak or Nautilus is a more original sports watch than the Ripples. That was not the point of this thread.
The point was to get some information on a brand that was well respected 10 or 20 years ago, and that has gone pretty much dark in the past few years. Thank you for your comments on the brand and identity, which I much appreciated.
I guess the reason why the watch post drew so much negativity is related to the high expectations a brand that launched watches like the Piccadilly must meet with everything that follows.