WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Independents

Apparent "resonance" might be something else?

 

Suitbert, I had an experience with a Resonance that I will describe with the hope that you might have some insight.


Of course the watch consists of two separate movements that AFAIK are supposedly directly connected to each other only in that the same winding stem winds both main springs.  Also each main spring barrel has its own click and AFAIK the purpose of the click is to prevent the wound main spring from unwinding without the regulated unwinding governed by its escapement.  Or maybe more accurately, it would not be possible to wind a main spring without a correctly functioning click.


In my Resonance I noted that with one of the main spring barrels, the click was stuck in the open position so that it was completely unengaged with the gear teeth of the main spring barrel.  The click of the other main spring barrel appeared to be functioning correctly.


It seems to me that if the two main spring barrels were designed to unwind independently of each other, with the rate of unwind of each governed only by the regulated rate of its escapement, then the main spring in the barrel that was not locked by the engaged click would not have held its wind.  Yet both main springs operated correctly.  IMO the only likely explanation is that the correctly functioning click on the one main spring barrel was also serving to control the other main spring barrel (that had the disengaged click), but how is this possible if the two main spring barrels are not connected in some way other than just the common winding stem?


Best regards.

  login to reply