WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Independents

...too many miracles?

 

Hi all,
not sure the old warchrap archives are still accesible (I guess they aren't) - but the Journe resonance was discussed quite extensively years ago.

The problem with this watch is - no data at all......at least not that I'd know (doesn't mean that much).
The basic difference compared to the duality is explained by some others already.
I miss mention of the Haldimann though - probably less mystique, but synchronizing of the two balance wheels through coupling of the hairspring studs (with an additional spring element) makes much sense and does indeed work, IMO.

I'm compltely in awe reading about all this miracles - i.e. those who are capable of actually beeing able to catch this perfect working synchronization "by the naked eye".
Wow, I knew I'm getting older, but even 10 years ago I'm pretty sure I couldn't....
The timing machine effect isn't that impressive to me - the built in filter simply picks one signal at a certain point - it's not designed to time two overlaying signals (to the best of my knowledge).

Personally I don't believe the Journe Resonance works, at least  in a technical sense.
One should also keep in mind, if  the system would indeed synchonize, both seconds readings (hands)  would stay visually perfectly in synch.  Those I've seen in the metall. usually tended to be a few seconds off after a day or so. Technically it's already "off" when one beat off , which would be a fraction of a second only....

As a sidenote to those who believe in the "air/laminar flow coupling theory,  if memory doesn't fail, Mr. Journe himself claimed that synchronization doesn't have to do with aerodynamic coupling, even in a vacuum it would perfectly synchronize.

To me the Resonance falls in a similar category as the Centigraphe (or lets say "About-aCenti-Graphe" smile

Don't take me wrong - I actiually like most fo Journes creations quite a lot .

Best regards
Suitbert



  login to reply