patrick_y[PuristSPro Moderator]
33705
An interesting debate...
Don, you have asked a very good question; do we care more about purity of form or the purity of having a movement individually manufactured for each watch?
I fortunately have a somewhat simple answer...
Among independents, it is not imperative for me to have a movement that is completely individualized. Independents need to focus on other more important aspects that give their watches a unique feel. For instance, Ludovic's Upside Down watch (a recent favorite of mine) may be based upon a fairly simple movement, but the uniqueness of the idea, is a thought process that identifies each artist.
Among large commercial brands, it is imperative for them to differentiate themselves internally. Especially when you consider these large commercial brands are sharing technology among others within their conglomerate.
This is a simple approach to a complex situation, but it isn't a one-size-fits all.
Merci, Philippe
By: nickd : November 2nd, 2010-07:09
Thanks for a very good reply. I'd agree 100% with what you say. When I had the pleasure of meeting you and Vianneny (and a couple of watches!) in Paris a few years ago the VERY last thing on my mind was "Is it a manufacture movement?". In the presence of ...
Don, just a remark.
By: foversta : November 1st, 2010-14:51
The 20x collection from Urwerk doesn't use the 7001. The 201 has a Lajoux-Perret base while the 202 and 203 use a GP automatic caliber. Your question is very interesting. The 7001 is a very reliable movement and powerful enough to animate the complication...
Fantastic question Don!
By: sidneyc : November 1st, 2010-16:03
.. and Damien hit it on the nail! For the question of whether a watch without a full in-house movement have it's value reduced, we only have to look at the following watches for an obvious answer, to name a few: Patek 5070/5970 Speake Marin Piccadilly, an...
Improvements?
By: nickd : November 2nd, 2010-07:23
Hi Don, Good questions. Are manufacture movements an improvement? Here's another way of thinking about it. Hope-Jones makes an interesting remark that the jumps in precision timekeeping and longterm stability from the classic Graham escapement to the Sync...
Lack of ebauche variety
By: tee530 : November 2nd, 2010-09:22
Very good discussion, and as my perspective is limited, I'll only offer a thought I don't think was covered above. As is well-documented, in the past many manufacturers used ebauches from outside suppliers and then modified or finished them to unique stan...
Great Topic
By: Meehna : November 2nd, 2010-10:36
I agree that the fervor for in-house movements has reached almost absurd proportions. Just because a movement is constructed in-house doesn't make it better or more reliable. I think everyone who commented raised valid points about the constant pressure t...
Another angle is...
By: DonCorson : November 2nd, 2010-12:11
the strange fact that the biggest alternative movement makers Sellita and Soprod, who in the meantime are producing in some quantities, are for the most part simply copying ETA movements (as are the Chinese too). More of the same? It is interresting to he...