Ian Skellern
14
That automatic URWERK UR-203 is not based on the Peseux 7001, Don
Nov 09, 2010,08:49 AM
The gear train on the UR-203 is based on an automatic winding Girard Perregaux calibre. URWERK's UR-103 has a movement based on the Peseux 7001.
Comments:
view entire thread
Not only foot but also a knee
By: Ares501 - Mr Green : November 1st, 2010-14:09
Think your pictorial said it all + very good & important issue "potential parts supply problems for repairs in the future" Sincerely Damian
The question is good, Don , but ...
By: Philippe M : November 1st, 2010-14:42
... the example is not that good, as the Antiqua is based on the Lemania 8810 not the Peseux 7001. However, your point is right : does the fact that some part are sourced from elsewhere spoiled the quality of these watches ? In other words, where is the i...
Merci, Philippe
By: nickd : November 2nd, 2010-07:09
Thanks for a very good reply. I'd agree 100% with what you say. When I had the pleasure of meeting you and Vianneny (and a couple of watches!) in Paris a few years ago the VERY last thing on my mind was "Is it a manufacture movement?". In the presence of ...
Paris in march
By: Philippe M : November 3rd, 2010-00:33
Hello Nick, Yes indeed, I remember you. That was in march 2006, during an horological dinner organized by our Alex ! We really had a good time ! Cheers
Shame on me ! You're right ...
By: Philippe M : November 9th, 2010-07:36
.... the 8810 is an automatic mouvement !! However the Antiqua winding system is anyway a creation of VH (probably is not satisfied with the one of the Lemania). Actually the 7001 is a manual caliber. As VH used it as a basis for his VH Goldpfeil Jumping ...
Don, just a remark.
By: foversta : November 1st, 2010-14:51
The 20x collection from Urwerk doesn't use the 7001. The 201 has a Lajoux-Perret base while the 202 and 203 use a GP automatic caliber. Your question is very interesting. The 7001 is a very reliable movement and powerful enough to animate the complication...
Fantastic question Don!
By: sidneyc : November 1st, 2010-16:03
.. and Damien hit it on the nail! For the question of whether a watch without a full in-house movement have it's value reduced, we only have to look at the following watches for an obvious answer, to name a few: Patek 5070/5970 Speake Marin Piccadilly, an...
I didn't know this was a problem
By: bedbug : November 1st, 2010-17:56
Hmm, I think it's fine to use base movements or trains/escapements etc. from existing calibers, sure. Where I get riled is when makers are purposely vague or outright untruthful about the 'in-house-ness' of their movements. I wouldn't want to see any less...
Compelling arguments...
By: pplater : November 1st, 2010-22:51
... and (without wishing to usurp anyone else's prerogative) - "Welcome!". It's always good to hear [read] a new voice on matters such as these. Cheers, pplater.
"Why in-house movements are not for Communists"...
By: pplater : November 2nd, 2010-01:04
Is it fair to assume that (as with most things) 'the market' will sort this out for us? What is the market? Try this as a formulation: "That body of people with sufficient interest, sufficient knowledge and sufficient resources to be likely to acquire (on...
well said mate
By: Hororgasm : November 2nd, 2010-02:47
" We will test the claims to ‘genetic purity’; we will compare and contrast the genius; we will gasp or sniff haughtily at the finish. We will then vote – with our wallets. " this captures it all.
i fell in love with your NEUTRAL point of view
By: aldossari_faisal : November 2nd, 2010-05:21
or opinion on the issue as a whole... it requires someone with wisdom to be neutral in this regard in order to come out with such a reading as the one you just explained... as i find in-house movements seductive and of an objective type in some cases in m...
Watches have movements inside?
By: cen@jkt : November 2nd, 2010-06:08
I thought it runs by itself, power by tiny swiss elves that required feeding every 5 years? On the side note: thanks to hororgames for summarising your thought into short sentence. I always need an executive summary when encountering your long, well writt...
Remember, Cen...
By: pplater : November 2nd, 2010-06:26
... lawyers are paid by the word! ;-) Cheers, pplater.
hororgames?
By: Hororgasm : November 4th, 2010-11:50
I like it....i will henceforth be known as hororgasm aka hororgames!!!
How can you reach
By: cen@jkt : November 4th, 2010-15:32
Orgasm by horology? Impossible! Hence forth thou shall be hororgames. cen@jkt
here is my answer ...
By: aldossari_faisal : November 4th, 2010-04:11
i personally recall myself a year ago when swatch group declared that no moevements parts to be sold anymore... i jumped off the ground back then and i was happy thinking that would be a berline wall like infront of watchmaking claimers who pop up every f...
Isn't it like the engine of the car?
By: KIH : November 2nd, 2010-02:41
How the car runs or engine works is, well, sort of, universal, and most of the internal combustion engines have lots in common. The new models boast more power, more fuel efficiency, or more automated computer system, etc., but the basic concept of the en...
Don, I suppose this comes back
By: DaMctosh : November 2nd, 2010-04:49
to the never-ending 'in-house" debate. I fall on the side that the base caliber does not matter as it's whats done that counts. There are some new in-house chrono movements which do not have the reliability or even feel of the workhorse 7750. I would not ...
some personal thoughts as a watchmaker
By: jfsuperior : November 2nd, 2010-06:42
Don, I'm more in favor of providing luxury watch buyers with a movement containing "technical" improvements. As a long time watchmaker, I remember well the basic manual wind movements manufactured by many small Swiss companies in the 1960's which were lat...
Informative and spot-on, Jack.
By: BDLJ : November 2nd, 2010-17:48
And fantastic to see the perspective from someone at the coal-face. I completely concur that getting to the guts of durability and serviceability is what I'd like to see. Increasingly, I see (to be impolite) unproven, Rube Goldbergish creations that reall...
Improvements?
By: nickd : November 2nd, 2010-07:23
Hi Don, Good questions. Are manufacture movements an improvement? Here's another way of thinking about it. Hope-Jones makes an interesting remark that the jumps in precision timekeeping and longterm stability from the classic Graham escapement to the Sync...
Lack of ebauche variety
By: tee530 : November 2nd, 2010-09:22
Very good discussion, and as my perspective is limited, I'll only offer a thought I don't think was covered above. As is well-documented, in the past many manufacturers used ebauches from outside suppliers and then modified or finished them to unique stan...
An interesting debate...
By: patrick_y : November 2nd, 2010-09:41
Don, you have asked a very good question; do we care more about purity of form or the purity of having a movement individually manufactured for each watch? I fortunately have a somewhat simple answer... Among independents, it is not imperative for me to h...
Great Topic
By: Meehna : November 2nd, 2010-10:36
I agree that the fervor for in-house movements has reached almost absurd proportions. Just because a movement is constructed in-house doesn't make it better or more reliable. I think everyone who commented raised valid points about the constant pressure t...
Another angle is...
By: DonCorson : November 2nd, 2010-12:11
the strange fact that the biggest alternative movement makers Sellita and Soprod, who in the meantime are producing in some quantities, are for the most part simply copying ETA movements (as are the Chinese too). More of the same? It is interresting to he...
I have a rule-of-thumb for high-end watches...
By: jmpTT : November 3rd, 2010-18:48
....if the movement can be replicated easily-enough such that the end consumer would have more-than-reasonable difficulty distinguishing between the genuine article and a well-made (but entirely theoretical) replica, then I would not consider the watch fo...