MTR
8892
Very interesting topic, Thomas!
Here are my very personal no-go’s (where I - please! - don't want to hurt or offend anyone):
* lovelessly produced movements without precision work in the high price (haute horlogerie) segment
* only on some sides polished hands
* movements that are too small in cases that are too large
* standardized white date wheels that are built into as many watches as possible, regardless of whether the color matches the dial or not (but I have to confess: I own a watch with a blue to black dial with a white date window where it works - perhaps because the date window nearly looks like one of the markers).
* „Automatic“ written on the dial
* watch models from the diving watch segment with a water resistance of only 3 bar
* in general: watches with a WR less than 10 bar (especially if they are meant to be „sports watches“). Ok, even 6 bar (Hi Nautilus! 😊) can be acceptable. A WR of 10 bar should be a minimum standard in modern watchmaking (but also here I have to confess: I own three watches with a WR of just 30m - a MR and two PCs - which I love immensely).
Best
Thomas
Watch Turn-Offs/Pet Peeves
By: Thomas_3 : July 9th, 2021-19:59
A couple of small details that make me shy away from a watch, the crown not being at the 3 o'clock position, and round watches being "flat" between the lugs, similar to some Seikos. Small details I agree, but turn-offs to me. What are your particular turn...
Turn-offs and my turn-ons
By: LiftAngle51 : July 9th, 2021-20:26
Watches which look not like watches. Known by the name time machines. Odd pistons which is a miniature of a supercar engine. Cost sometimes crazy amounts of money. Why should i pay for a thing that is more an advertorial? The baddest silly peace, Breitlin...
A few…
By: Tiggermelad : July 10th, 2021-06:52
For example: Blunt tips of hands, especially on “precision” watches like chronographs. ( I make an exception for my 15202 as a stylistic quirk!). Short hands which don’t reach the relevant markers. Numerals for the even numbers only. Dauphine hands with a...
1. Date window at 4.30.
By: hoseachandra : July 10th, 2021-06:59
2. Very low legibility (silver hands on silver dial, silver hands on black dial). Without lume of course 3. Skeleton dial on common / unimpressive movement 4. Short hands 5. Sport watch that claim 100 mtr WR or above, without screw down crown 6. Over hype...
Very interesting topic, Thomas!
By: MTR : July 10th, 2021-07:20
Here are my very personal no-go’s (where I - please! - don't want to hurt or offend anyone): * lovelessly produced movements without precision work in the high price (haute horlogerie) segment * only on some sides polished hands * movements that are too s...
Here I go for hates:
By: chippyfly : July 10th, 2021-13:28
Date wheel colour that does not match the dial: such a basic design error. "Automatic" on the dial and all other unnecessary words. There is always the case back for words if the wearer forgets! Screw down-crown where WR less than 5 bar. Screw-down crown ...