JoshTheCanadian
434
As others have said…
This analysis is correct as to the product-specific tariff. Fortunately, watches under the harmonized tariff regime have experienced relatively low tariffs (try, in contrast, importing fabric!).
Now, however, we have a country specific tariff that will be assessed against the declared value of the good. This plays out in a few different ways.
For independents, which sell direct to consumer, you will be paying 39% of the retail price in country-specific tariffs. Yowza! Some may seek to try to game the system… do so at your own peril. I’d prefer not to be on the hook for felony customs fraud! In all seriousness, I’d really urge people not to play the “send papers in one envelope and send the watch in another.” This can lead to jail time when you are talking about defrauding the US out of real money.
A brand like Patek is interesting. Patek imports watches through HSNY, then distributes the watches to ADs, which in turn sell the watches at retail. The tariff will be assessed on the imported value of the watch. I imagine that HSNY takes a cut for its operations and all that. So, for a $50,000 watch at MSRP, the imported value may be somewhere in the realm of $20,000, so a country-specific tariff of around $7,800 would apply to that $50,000 watch. Then, HSNY sells that watch to the AD for $30,000, and pays taxes on its revenue. This is why prices went up by 15% in the US. This is probably what Patek needs to keep its profit, and it is using its market position to extract concessions from ADs.