WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

Agree somewhat and will add first...

 

Two pieces from the stable of RM.

The 002 and the 009. Why these two? Well the 002 was the first watch from RM that appealed AND made me think as to how the perception of luxury as being simple watches was overturned by RM through the addition/implementation of a shock-proof tourbillon coupled with the torque meter and power reserve functions of Papi into an ultra ergonomic tonneau shaped daily wearer. The vaunted AP CW1 which housed these complications first IIRC was and is just too big as an extended wearer for people with normal wrists. The AP Cabinet pieces which housed these complications didn't visually appeal to me.

The 009 then came along and blew whatever was left of the carnage caused by the 002. It obliterated the notion that luxurious watches needed to have heft on the wrist. Doing away with the torque meter and the power reserve whilst maintaining the tourbillon sent waves onto the watch industry that paved the way for further research/marketing of lighter weighing watches.

Of your original 15, I am in total agreement except for PP 2526 and the Duality, two watches that have no merit for me simply and ONLY because I have not had the good fortune to examine them in the metal and learn about them. Hence the lack of awareness/intellectual appeal on my part. Thank you for bringing them to my scant attention.

The remaining 13 + two RMs mentioned comprise for me THE list, on any grounds.

Well maybe throw in the 5016 topping my list up to 16 watches that appeal intellectually as well as on other grounds. Great post!!

smile

  login to reply
💰228 Marketplace Listings for Richard Mille