ArmisT
6865
Marc, are you sure the first one is the correct 5402?
I don’t know enough, but I went to look it up thinking this is the original, but wondered why the AP logo is at 12 o’clock. But looking up an AP site article shows a 5402st version which is similar to the 15402 although with white date wheel. Please clarify if you would.
Survey: Which Royal Oak would you choose …
Friends, If you had the choice of either the: 1. 5402 - 39 mm 2. 15202 - 39 mm 3. 15500 - 41 mm To add to your collection. Which would you choose? You can only choose one of the three choices. No long stories or long questions etc. Just choose one of the ...
15202
The 41 mm too big for my 7 inch wrist, and I prefer a matching date wheel if a watch is going to have a date!
Marc, are you sure the first one is the correct 5402?
I don’t know enough, but I went to look it up thinking this is the original, but wondered why the AP logo is at 12 o’clock. But looking up an AP site article shows a 5402st version which is similar to the 15402 although with white date wheel. Please clari...
🤣🙏🏽
But I think there may have been different dials, since your other picture also pops up. That’s why I’m asking.
the dials of the 5402 were different with the different series
apchronicles.audemarspiguet.com
Very nice, this explains it!
Interesting that there was such degree of difference. Regardless, very educational article. Thanks.
16202 (as a choice above the listed 15202) bc of the upgraded movement.
The 15500 is too bulky and sporty and the 5402 is too brittle and I’m not a fan of date windows with different colors (compared to the dial)
I like the movement better in the 15510.
It’s more important than the date wheel color to me 👍
Results
Thanks to all who responded Results: 1. 5402-39 mm 6 votes 2. 15202-39 mm 13 votes 3. 15500-41 mm 3 votes The 15202 is a clear winner here. Having said that: a) I have posted a "nicer" picture of the 15202 compared to the 5402. b) I did not talk about the...
Even later than wangany ☺️
But it won’t change the result. 15500 for me. Cheers Thomas
