amanico[JLC Moderator]
341499
Here it would be better to own a 1675 to get the pair with your 5513...
Jan 06, 2021,09:49 AM
Such as this one:
Or this one....
Comments:
view entire thread
Royal oak
By: Lankysudanese : January 4th, 2021-04:38
...
Awesome!
By: Watcholic_id : January 4th, 2021-18:57
5170G
By: ZSHSZ : January 4th, 2021-04:58
...
GSOTM
By: myles721 : January 4th, 2021-05:08
...
Nice
By: Chronometer (aka yacomino) : January 4th, 2021-09:43
ππΎ
By: Watcholic_id : January 4th, 2021-18:59
Double Sub !!!
By: leopold : January 4th, 2021-08:13
With date , but not with the good date ... ...
Very cool
By: Watcholic_id : January 4th, 2021-19:00
πππ
By: Watcholic_id : January 4th, 2021-19:02
Fantastic way to start your 1st Monday, my friend ππΎ
Nice 5513.
By: Miles_151 : January 4th, 2021-09:24
This today. M. ...
thanks!
By: Watcholic_id : January 4th, 2021-19:03
wow! that's a superb specimen!
116600
By: kkochheiser : January 4th, 2021-09:25
Nothing fancy. Kent ...
brilliant!
By: Watcholic_id : January 4th, 2021-19:03
Beautiful shot and piece.
By: PhinneyWood : January 27th, 2021-08:36
Iβve been hunting for a NOS 116600 for a couple months now. Not an easy task anymore it would seem.
Up down
By: Chronometer (aka yacomino) : January 4th, 2021-09:43
...
THATβS
By: myles721 : January 4th, 2021-10:06
NICE!!!
ππ
By: holdemchamp1225 : January 5th, 2021-11:25
Yeah. I just love it!
By: mrds : January 5th, 2021-13:02
Not many designs that look as fresh 60 years later. There are many great Subs, but this one just has all the DNA that makes this watch what it is. Glad you enjoy!
Agreed π
By: holdemchamp1225 : January 5th, 2021-14:48
Merci, Nico.
By: mrds : January 6th, 2021-04:45
Now if I had your 6542 too, that would be quite a pair!
Itβs not a 5513 but a 6536/1
By: mrds : January 6th, 2021-09:52
For the 5513, the 1675 is indeed the right βbrotherβ. And the two specimens in your pic are top notch.
Oh yeah!!
By: Watcholic_id : January 7th, 2021-01:22
the no crown guard brothers, magnificent!