amorns_
6
In reality
I would say 5004 and 3970 2nd edition
Interesting
By: Baron - Mr Red : May 13th, 2009-10:47
5002P cuts in very close for me. I would have to try it on, but agree that it is a truly beautiful watch. Quite a lot of agreement on the 5070s. The choice in the 5070s is taste, i agree. For me, I am not a big fan of the greyish dial, so that would rule ...
Hmmm...
By: KCLQMULKU : May 13th, 2009-11:44
Something old (2438) Something new (5159G) Something different (Star Caliber!) and something blue (5102) ...then again if money was truly no object I would commission PP to build me my own wristwatch! This message has been edited by KCLQMULKU on 2009-05-1...
My top two....
By: patrick_y : May 13th, 2009-14:53
The 5140, one of the best perpetual calendars on the market. Period. And some sort of minute repeater, preferably one with the cathedral gongs. But I'm still working on starting off with the first Patek; which is neither of the two.
5004 vs 5970
By: fnk : May 15th, 2009-02:04
Considering one has a double chrono, I'm just wondering why the 5970 scored more votes than the 5004. Is there some other difference that makes the 5970 more desirable. fnk
See above
By: watch-guy.com : May 15th, 2009-21:40
I agree we are all amazed by high end horology and I understand the fascination witht these pieces but where is the love, I ask As a purist I think we should look beyond all the complications and dare I say it, hype of the tourbillon, split second chrono ...