Mark in Paris[Purist]
10488
Bon appétit !
And I'll read your thoughts with great interest François 
Cheers,
Mark
It is rather simple.
By: amanico : February 26th, 2013-14:19
Why I didn't get, and won't get a Langematik Pepetual? Because it houses the same Cal than the Langematik Anniversary, with a module. Why won't I get a patek QP? For the same reason: I already own a 5110P, so the same Cal 240 with a different module. Why ...
I beg to differ Nico...
By: dreamer8 : February 26th, 2013-19:35
I have no problem with a 240 based QP, but would have a problem if the module is a chronograph module ( goes against past PP chronograph philosophy ). To the best of my knowledge, the 240 was designed with complications in mind. I also prefer the pusher f...
And by the way...
By: Dje : February 27th, 2013-09:11
Hi, Yes I've had in the last 20 years many calibres 1120 and 2120 in hand, be they in AP RO Jumbo, RO perpetual skeleton, Jules Audemars simple watch or EOT PC, or older watches, or in many VCs like Saltarello, Mercator, Audubon, perpetual calendars, espe...
I hear you, Jerome.
By: amanico : February 27th, 2013-08:21
Even Lange doesn't develop one movement per watch, if you take the example of the Langematik movement, which you find in the simple " Langematik " as well as in the Wempe LE ( Power Reserve indicator ) and in the Langematik Perpetual ( QP module ). But I ...
Yes and no
By: Dje : February 27th, 2013-09:05
Hi Nicolas, sorry for your tea! The reference 5100 had a specific calibre, but was limited at 3000 pieces if I remember well, so not a small series. That was probably enough to develop and justify a specific calibre (that was eventually possibly partially...
cal 240
By: Grisar : February 26th, 2013-15:26
I like 240 for the following reasons: 240 is so far, based on my personal experience, the most reliable Patek's automatic movement (among 315, 330, 324, 240). Winding efficiency is very good. (even many claim that 240 is due to the size of rotor inefficie...
I think it's fine
By: Albert.J : February 26th, 2013-16:26
That's not the only concern about Caliber 240. There are even more widely used movements such as IWC Caliber 5000, or GO , and etc. but they are all considered very fine movements. Especially Zenith El Primero, which consists almost 70 percent of whole co...
I agree Fricks,
By: Mark in Paris : February 27th, 2013-05:56
I love that watch too and as Oliver's post concerned the 240 caliber I was only focusing the movement. But as you said, the bracelet, the case and, last but not least, the dial are absolutely great. That's why I bought this fantastic watch, and I love it,...
You spot it right
By: Mark in Paris : March 2nd, 2013-10:23
As you said Oliver maybe I forget what I'm waiting for compared to the production capacity and the overall demand of these watches. I was a bit unfair there. I took back the 5712 from the safe since friday and I must say this is way above the average fini...
angle finish
By: Grisar : February 27th, 2013-16:26
Dear Mark, I am fully with you on the fact that most Patek movements can be improved in terms of angle finish. I compared 240, 315, 324, 28-20 (5100 mvmt), 27-70 (Lemania based chrono), CH 29-535 (5170), R TO 27 (3939) and R 27 (5078). In general, my find...
Angle finishing
By: Grisar : February 27th, 2013-16:27
Some more to share. In addition: - It's much more difficult to finish (angle part) the bridges on 240 because they are very thin and (relatively) big. The improper (or say over) angling could cause shape change of the bridges. - Lange's German silver base...
I'm of two minds
By: ZJ : February 28th, 2013-08:19
I do agree that it would be preferable to have a movement purpose-built for each reference, no modules, etc. But then you have the 5970 and its kin having the same movement as a cheap Omega... Doesn't make them less desirable in my view. I confess I am in...