TomasEriksson
72
5960P vs 5140P
So I currently have a 5960p and is concidering trading it towards a 5140p. Main reasons being the smaller and slimmer 5140 makes it a better daily wearer but I also like the romantic part of wearing a perpetual calendar. Thoughts? Does everyone agree that the 5140p is upgrade?
Attached are pictures of me wearing my 5960 and trying to 5140.
Available on the marketplace
2,889 Patek Philippe listings are live on the eBay market and 1722 collector listings on the WatchProSite marketplace.
New Release
Explore Patek Philippe's 2016 novelties from Baselworld, including the 5164R Aquanaut and 5170R chronograph. Mark in Paris reviews new models, design philosophy, and collector reactions.
110 replies84889 views
Innovation
Explore Patek Philippe's 5550P with GyromaxSi balance and Oscillomax escapement. A breakthrough in precision horology, advancing the Caliber 240 movement.
96 replies67425 views
Collection
Dje explores the Patek Philippe 5146G as an ideal everyday watch. Discover its annual calendar, slate dial, and why collectors love this reference.
73 replies63901 views
New Release
Discover Patek Philippe's 2012 Baselworld novelties, including the Ref. 5204 split-seconds perpetual calendar chronograph and Nautilus updates.
76 replies59044 views
Review
Hands-on review of the Patek Philippe 5327 Perpetual Calendar. Compare its new 39mm case, dial, and caliber 240 Q to the 5140.
68 replies42267 views
Review
Explore the Patek Philippe 5940G black dial perpetual calendar. Mark in Paris reviews its cushion case, legibility, and Patek's dial strategy.
47 replies41962 views
5960P vs 5140P
So I currently have a 5960p and is concidering trading it towards a 5140p. Main reasons being the smaller and slimmer 5140 makes it a better daily wearer but I also like the romantic part of wearing a perpetual calendar. Thoughts? Does everyone agree that...
Exactly the same for me,
I wouldn’t hesitate, especially as I like the micro rotor 240 caliber better than the central rotor one. And imo the 5140 fits your wrist better. But it’s very subjective of course. Best, Emmanuel
Apples and pears.
For me certainly not an upgrade but a sideways change. Both special in their own way but the 5960p 1st edition for me will always feel a special milestone for Patek and the companies history. M.
3940 5140 5960 for me.
But honestly they are all great. Just a matter of what you like.
Not a fan of the 5140
.. I find the date ring to be disproportionately large.. and the fonts a mess eg the shrunken dates.. so I would stick to the 5960P
To me definitely an
upgrade to PC in P !👍 The only small issue is the compressed date numerals, which would not be a deal breaker for me. Best of luck with your decision!
The 5960 is a milestone reference for Patek, but my personal preference goes to the steel 1A, vs. 5140, it’s a modernized version of the 3940, so not as iconic.
But this is hobby based on emotions, so go for what makes you happy! As for the small date numerals, totally disregard it, since I remember when the 5140 was introduced, someone came up whit this observation and everyone just repeated the same thing, whil...
I like your point about how a given feature on a certain brand may be highlighted as being negative while at the same time lauding other brands’ models with same feature.
Although PP is one of those lauded brands that usually gets a pass😊. So, your advice about the 5140p, which is a lovely piece, is well taken.
Thank you!
I was just trying to highlight the heard mentality and opinion forming vs. individual thinking which is so infuriating (to me), this days…
Out of these two the 5140. I used to have a 5960G in my collection but realized I prefer a manual chrono over automatic so swapped it for a 5172. I also prefer to have 1 reference complication than several combined.
So manual chrono over auto Perpetual over annual Worldtimer over GMT And a combination of these “lesser” complications never trumps a watch with only a single “more advanced” complication.
I’d choose 5140.
It it an elegant look. I had a 5140 but moved it to get a 5327. Very happy going to perpetual calendar route.
Between the 5960p and 5140p, I would choose the
5960p. If you really want a perpetual calendar, there are better references.
Both amazing references!
But I will always have a soft spot for the 5960P, its history, design, and sheer practicality. Good luck with whatever you choose, and follow your heart! Having said that, if it was between this and the 3940...
Of these 2 I like 5960 better as it is more special and interesting IMHO.
As for 5140 - it has a benefit of smaller size that fits your wrist better.
I personally like both. If I would have to choose I would boil it down to what style of place in my collection is more with a gap:
Due to complications, case size, etc. the 5960 is sporty classic while the 5140 is romantic classic. Depending which one I would crave more I would accordingly choose. Last comment, I personally like more the slate dial 5140. Makes it even more special im...
Interesting. I didn't know 5960 v 5140 would generate so much discussion.
I think 5960 is a better watch, but 5140 suits your wrist better. And you mentioned wearability / slimness a few times. However I feel you may like the 5140 to meet a price point. Instead, you may want another thin watch whose date function is easy to set...
IMHO, I don't see it as an upgrade but quite the contrary...
I have never really understood the boundary between "complications" and "grand complications" in Patek's catalogue, specially with Perpetual Calendars. Only explanation I can find is marketing and price positioning... To me, an Annual Calendar - Monocount...
Thank you all for the valuable input
Very much appreciated all the responses. So I made the call to keep the 5960p in the collection, Im trying to make it work by offloading some watches from other brands. It's not as easy to liquidate watches now as it was a couple of years back so it might...