MattS
2639
Wow very nice!
This is great focus, I love this first version of the Seamaster, one of the most if not the most elegant vintage diver with its thin bezel, and I love this theme as well. I have been working on a similar yet different them, which is to try and get one nice example of each brand, so for Omega I have a 1961, 14755 with an inverted "30" bezel which I believe has been re done by Omega, for the rest here is my quintet, no dates from this period 1955-1961
congratulations on your fantastic Omega collection, would love to see a full family picture!
Matt
A triplet near completion
Hello Guys this is a project very close to completion. In the years I have completed the Seamaster 300 twisted lug series (165.024, 166.024, 165.024 Royal Navy, 165.024 in NOS conditions). That was between 2000 and 2005. Then I started the Seamaster 300 s...
Wonderful, Franco
Many thanks for sharing. You made my week. Just one original bezel is already a perf... think 3! But... no lollipop second hand within for trio? Just kidding of course. Fantastic trio. Best Z'
Nop
... no lollipop and no inverted numerical scale. Early 2913 had inverted numerical bezel, and lollipop. On this one would have been wrong , because it is a 2913-3 of Aug 1958, too late for those. But ... have all the original bracelets (7077, 7912, 1506 a...
I could be insanely happy . . .
. . . with just one, Franco. You must be on cloud 9 . . .
What can I say?
This is something I had in mind, too. But you did it, when I am still thinking about this project. ;) Just superb, my friend. Will you post the 165 024 trio, too? Best and thanks for the share, it is a real big pleasure, as I am a big fan of the Seamaster...
Yes Nico
Hi Nicholas (in Italian - Nico) here is a collage of pics of my other SM300s, twisted lugs. These as the previous ones are all confirmed by Omega Extracts, inncluding the Royal Navy. Unfortunately all in a different light etc, next time I go to the bank I...
You Damn Evil
In French, Damn Evil = Franco. :) :) :) A NOS which is not a Watchco ( supposing that a Watchco can be seen as a NOS, but this is another question... ) is something improbable to find, and you did iit! I had a superb 165 024 " straight lugs " ( the first ...
Bang, Franco did it again!
Poor me I have to make do with a single W10! Yet another great series you have there Franco. Many thanks for sharing. Best Z'
just excellent, my friend ! i envy you for your focus; i`m hopeless.....
buying what i liked over the years and brands....came the last one from the bay/kstar? have a great weekend. kind regards. achim
It needs a lot of...
Hi Franco, It needs a lot of knowledge about the important details to find these pieces in all original condition or complete them accordingly - very well done! Huge congrats for this fantastic collection! Was this the reason why you sacrificed some of yo...
Yup
Yes Erich buying them is easy, completing them properly much much less easy. The chronometrers I sold recently they were sold either because they were doubles, or to buy the thing below, or for both reasons. BWs Franco ...
Great trio
Finding examples with complete original bezels are getting harder and harder.
Congtrats Franco !!
Hi Franco Congrats !! They look great !! I find myself with only one Seamaster 3oo left in my collection.... 2913-2 with the countdown bezel but no lollipop hand... I would up keeping more chronometres !! go figure .... Good Hunting Bill Sohne
So, Bill and Franco, to be clear, does the CK 2913 - 3 have to get the countdown insert?
Or is it the privilege of the -2? Best, Nicolas
I do not know, really ....
Hi Nico I have no hard proofs, it is just result of collective thinking. What I know is that I have never seen a vintage Omega catalogue/brochure with the lollipop seconds hand in a 2913, not even in Steve Waddington's collection. But I would love to know...
The lollipop did come original in the 2913
Have seen enough examples that look original enough to believe it. Can't make any hard and fast rules though about which 2913 version would have it.
My observation
Is that the -3 can have either - I have seen examples with original bezels in both forms for this model. I believe either bezel type is correct. It's not like these bezels grow on trees so if you see -3 with an intact original bezel then it is likely that...
THank you, guys. I asked that because I've seen both on the -3, with damaged inserts.
Hence my confusion. Thank you for your input and knowledge, Gentlemen. Nicolas
they are just stunning Franco
I thought i was doing well with a 165.014 and 165.024 both from the same year, but your double triplet beats them hands down. Enjoy Graham
Wow very nice!
This is great focus, I love this first version of the Seamaster, one of the most if not the most elegant vintage diver with its thin bezel, and I love this theme as well. I have been working on a similar yet different them, which is to try and get one nic...
Lovely and about the lollipop..
Beautiful trio there, I too am in the middle of the same journey, having started some years ago with a 165014. Then at the beginning of this year I managed to find a 2913-3 with straight seconds hand. After that I was completely smitten and very soon afte...
Update
... now found an original Naiad (not furniture) - the triplet is now complete in its entirety :-) Best wishes Franco