Features
Spotlight
Featured Forums
IWC
Brand Forums
Lifestyle
Resources
ios

Omega: you obviously need...

no, its 35.5 mm only. You obviously still don´t have my book - you will definitely need it... .-))
1M
By: mac_omega
1

Omega: Most probably a legitimate variant

Hi all forumers, I am a bit late to the party due to time difference... IMO this is most probably a legitimate variant of a 2364 dial As Art has already mentioned there is a similarly designed (though different) dial vaiant with similarly embossed hour markers shown in my book about 30 mm Omega Chro
10M
By: mac_omega
2

Omega: stupidity continues...

I wonder what comes next And people still lining up for this junk!
1Y
By: mac_omega
1

Omega: I only judged by the profile...

Art, as I did not see the face of the crown I only judged by the profile which looked correct... original ones are hard to find
1Y
By: mac_omega
0

Omega: well done!

Art, you have got an honest original specimen. Even the crown seems to be the original which is very hard to find... enjoy!
1Y
By: mac_omega
1

Omega:

Sorry to contradict - cal 342 is not a chronometre movement. A cal. 343 would be but I expect rather a cal 333 due to the larger size of the case. Omega database lists a 332 for this case reference which is non chronometre. I assume this case reference might have been equipped with both, the non-chr
1Y
By: mac_omega
2

Omega: mixed up parts...

Hi Art, movement cal. 344 is correct for this reference but there are wrong parts on this calibre: ratchet and crown wheel and special regulator. They belong to the chronometre cal. 343
1Y
By: mac_omega
1

Omega: I would call it "semi-white whale"

Hi Nicholas, I would rather call it "semi-white whale" because only the dial is uncommon. Its believed that this dial was some sort of "trial" or you may call it "prototype dial"... but besides this dial the rest was more like the common 2777. It missed the most important part in the movement which
1Y
By: mac_omega
0