I’m surprised to hear this issue happening with a co-axial movement, which is supposed to reduce the wear and tear and extend service periods (albeit by working at the level of the escapement’s interaction with the balance spring, and not at the chrono part of the movement). However, I’m not entirely surprised since the chrono function in this particular timepiece is cam-actuated as opposed to column wheel and vertical clutch. So, in spite of it being NASA flight-certfied, it’s not the most energy efficient and smooth chrono functionality (like the celebrated FPJ centrigraphe or JLC Duometre or the many vertical clutch column wheel chronos like the breitling B01 etc).