Malik_Fazal
2
Rehman
Dec 08, 2018,01:41 AM
Hi
Your total details about 2914-5s are not correct
Because 175.27.001 upto 175.27.010 are seamaster/Rancheros this was a mix Bach of 2996 and 2914-5. The first 2914-5 serial starts from 175.27.011 upto 030 and the next 10 peices were 2996
Comments:
view entire thread
Interesting patina indeed.
By: kolosstt : February 6th, 2016-05:56
Like the close-up. Do we see some scratches on the hour hand made by the minute hand? Anyways, what a nice piece. Cheers, Kolosstt
A holy monster, indeed.
By: amanico : February 6th, 2016-07:50
Here is mine, welcoming yours. There was also the Railmaster 2d generation, the 135 004, which was issued to the PAF. But I don't have the numbers for this last reference. Best, Nicolas ...
A piece of history!
By: blomman Mr Blue : February 6th, 2016-09:27
Congrats! Super catch! Best Blomman
Rehman
By: Malik_Fazal : December 8th, 2018-01:41
Hi Your total details about 2914-5s are not correct Because 175.27.001 upto 175.27.010 are seamaster/Rancheros this was a mix Bach of 2996 and 2914-5. The first 2914-5 serial starts from 175.27.011 upto 030 and the next 10 peices were 2996
+1 [nt]
By: HSTE : December 8th, 2018-15:45
Railmaster
By: Malik_Fazal : December 8th, 2018-02:27
Hi
What elevates PAFs in my view . . .
By: Dr No : December 8th, 2018-11:20
. . . is the dedicated movement inscription. Can't recall another Omega reference sharing that detail. There were scads of 2179s with 'US ARMY' engravings on the back, but I believe those were inscribed after delivery. Art
In a sense, they're even better . . .
By: Dr No : December 9th, 2018-14:42
. . . than having an extract. The P.A.F. engraving is a contemporary validation of originality. The ultimate obscure Speedy collection would be a brace of P.A.F. and A.C.P. examples. And I believe there's at least one guy here who can claim ownership of b...
👍🏻 [nt]
By: HSTE : December 9th, 2018-22:27