amanico
[JLC Moderator]
405439
Omega Speedmaster ST 105 002. A cool one.
This reference is magic, and a bit mysterious as it is a kind of transitional one, between the CK 2998 and the ST 105 003. Made only during one year or two. Rarer than any other CK, being 2915 or 2998.
Add a nice patina, like this one, and you have something magic, mysterious and rare.
Credit: Watchfid.
Best,
Nicolas
Vintage
Explore the Omega Speedmaster ST 105.002, a rare transitional reference, and the debate among collectors on preserving or restoring its unique tropical dial patina.
37 replies7175 views
Vintage
Discover the rare Omega Speedmaster ST 105.002. Collectors discuss its history, rarity, and market position compared to other vintage Speedmaster references.
22 replies3620 views
Vintage
Explore the rare Omega Speedmaster ST 105.002, a vintage straight-lug reference with a brief production run, highly sought after by collectors. Discover its unique place in Speedmaster history.
20 replies1965 views
Vintage
Compare vintage Omega Speedmaster CK 2998-6 and ST 105 002 with amanico s photos. Learn to spot subtle differences between these iconic references.
26 replies1860 views
Vintage
Uncover the true history of the Omega Speedmaster and its NASA connection. KIH's article features Omega Museum Manager Petros Protopapas, challenging common myths.
101 replies69789 views
Vintage
Explore Amanico's quest for a vintage Omega Speedmaster, from the elusive CK 2915 to the iconic Alaska Type 2. Discover expert insights on collecting early references.
66 replies15017 views
Omega Speedmaster ST 105 002. A cool one.
This reference is magic, and a bit mysterious as it is a kind of transitional one, between the CK 2998 and the ST 105 003. Made only during one year or two. Rarer than any other CK, being 2915 or 2998. Add a nice patina, like this one, and you have someth...
I like patina as much as the next guy but for me this is past its best before date.
There is a point where patina becomes corrosion. This is that point (in my eyes).
Dial is tops in my book . . .
. . . although I have doubts about the pushers and, to a lesser extent, the crown. But the 'face' is altogether original, in my humble opinion. 🤙🏻
For sure. And I typically adore a nice, warm dial wise with age.
But this time, for me. I'm certain it has a very, very happy owner however. To each their own!
I love vintage...
...but some patina looks like damage. In the case of dive watches, it looks like water got into the cases. Not sure how this dial got this way. If it were my watch I would love it, but I'd wonder if the manufacturer were using defective materials...
Sorry but I don’t t get this…
It’s a wreck It’s like saying that this is a nice Porsche ...
Oh, modern, had a chocolate brown leather strap
And bought the bracelet later, a good looking thing.. And had an exhibition caseback to boot.
Good observation. The introduction date for tritium is in dispute . . .
. . . with a consensus of early '60s as most likely. The dial of Nicolas' 105.002 subject does not have 'T' markings, but the badging of tritium dials likely occurred after its debut by at least a year or two. So yes, the degradation could well be due to ...
Yeah
If you blow up the photo it looks as if the markers melted. Perhaps they’ve all fallen off and we are looking at the glue remains, but that seems less likely
Wrong dial
So many have commented on the condition of the dial but none has recognised that it is possibly a wrong dial for this reference... I would expect an A5 dial with much longer luminous indexes reaching the subdials combined with low "SWISS MADE". The watch ...
You have the eyes of a hawk, Erich. A dial swap . . .
. . . is entirely possible. Impressed, Art