Mech
1986
You said.....
"It used to be 60yrs, between the real vintage & remake (or should I say hommage?) (3646 vs. PAM21, 6152/1 vs. PAM127) then it shrunk to ~10yrs? (5201/201A vs. PAM0000, PAM21 vs PAM232) then it went further below 10yrs (26A,B vs. 26K, 28A/B/C vs 28L, etc etc) then down to ~5yrs (249 vs 448, PAM217 vs PAM368, PAM194 vs PAM285)"
actually it sounds like a good idea to start presenting photos of these watches alongside what you said... it'd be pretty cool..?? I'm sure yours and some of the guys here who has a great pam collection could pull one out?
HAGWE
Mech.
Few thoughts...
By: Jester : January 21st, 2013-18:30
I've always thought the submersible is a bit under appreciated but in my mind, it represents the DNA of Panerai the best. Having seen various after-market PVD/DLC'ed out PAM24/25, I didn't think it looks half bad. It's only a matter of time before OP came...
To a certain degree
By: Jester : January 21st, 2013-19:46
I do agree w/ your assessment on the 'lack' of progress. However, as I've often mentioned, I think this is partly 'our' fault. The collectors, or the market, would put a premium whenever we have some models w/ strict lineage to the history. (Ok, this is M...
Agreed
By: Stefan2 : January 21st, 2013-21:07
I think you're absolutely correct. What we're seeing is perhaps an over-responsiveness to the core collectors, with perhaps over-repetitive pieces for those whom obsess over what is "historically correct", with an attempt to find favor among the broader, ...
You said.....
By: Mech : January 26th, 2013-21:06
" It used to be 60yrs, between the real vintage & remake (or should I say hommage?) (3646 vs. PAM21, 6152/1 vs. PAM127) then it shrunk to ~10yrs? (5201/201A vs. PAM0000, PAM21 vs PAM232) then it went further below 10yrs (26A,B vs. 26K, 28A/B/C vs 28L,...