mdg
10676
Too big/too much going on...
...I understand that it's a 'signature look,' but it's too much for me. Rolex and others manage to use 'normal' crowns and get very good depth ratings...
Another year without stuff for the old school Paneristi we are. So what about a true Panerai?
Ok, let's see what is, for you, a true Panerai. For me, I will start with the PAM 372: You? Bet, Nicolas ...
There's hope
A few decent radiomirs have come out, albeit not in 47, let's see what they do with the luminor!
Looks gorgeous…
…including these lovely golden hands. Pity that my wrist size is not sufficient to wear that gem 😢
You are right dear Nicolas!! Fortunately there are several offerings which…
… I feel can be considered true Panerai or at least we can feel the DNA is present in them. These are a few examples: Pam 422 Pam 622 Pam 992 Pam 1075 Pam 721 Pam 557 Pam 424 ...
For Panerai I prefer clean and simple. Bought a 372 when it first came out. Loved it but sold it to a friend when size started to bother me. Search for a 44mm replacement started with a
steel 590 (a baby Egizioni?). Later I also bought a titanium 562, simple and with sandwich dial. Quite happy with both. ...
A return to the roots is beyond-necessary at this point.
My local boutique shuttered down a week ago, because of poor sales (which is understandable since all they stocked was submersibles and due’s). To me, the ideal PAM is my 384, a 233, your 372 or (maybe) a bronzo. Here’s to hoping. Hussam ...
Too big/too much going on...
...I understand that it's a 'signature look,' but it's too much for me. Rolex and others manage to use 'normal' crowns and get very good depth ratings...
I see that many places have it listed as 10ATM...
...which is adequate, but there's a lot going on with the crown...too much for me...
My favorite for the longest time. .
The other is a preA9 which I sold to a good friend ...
Any model....
produced between 1936 and 1997. Alfa.... Omega: Have a good weekend guys. Cheers ...
