ArmisT
8791
These are very helpful thoughts and advice, thank you 🙏🏽
I had noticed an old post of yours dated Nov 6, 2022 which had a picture of most [but not all] of your PAMs and left me wondering what’s the size of them all. As advised, I will change the strap and wear less tightly to give another try. But I also think there is room for a proper 44mm piece at some point, maybe the 5218 or a cool destro. Thanks again.
Source WPS
Newfound interest in 44mm PAMs.
Even for those whose feelings had cooled over recent years, I believe the 5218 has helped to rekindle interest in the brand and at least a curiosity in what else they have planned. Interestingly, there seems to be a newfound interest in 44 mm sized pieces...
I'm sharing your feelings
Have also had a growing interest in 44mm Panerais, though I admit that's from the opposite direction (I'd always thought they were way too big for me and avoided them). I got a nice basic 44mm Luminor in titanium last year: And a 44mm Submersible just a f...
😍Both enticing and look to fit just right.
Is that Submersible the 731? I have the 243 which is a thick bad boy.
Oh that’s right, the 731 is a blue dial, the 24 is classic black.
I’m addicted to their Submersibles💪🏽
Perfect.
And those, or variations of them, in titanium were my two daily PAMs from 2003 to 2008 or so. There were others at the same time, more than I needed, but a 25 and 177 both titanium were what I wore most.
I did indeed and thank you for all the help!
An introductory post for the watch would have been/would be called for, I know.
I can’t deny the fun! Part of my issue with the 372 may just be the need to try a different strap.
But you also demonstrate the benefit of having various sizes and styles. Pretty much all my Luminors were 47mm…need some diversity.
I let my 372 go a long long time ago.
That and some other 47mm which still remained. My wrist is smaller now, but with with the extra half inch if that of a decade or more ago 47mm was objectively too much. But 44mm, still the right size for me. I’ve tried the smaller cases many times at the ...
Jay, I believe it was actually one of your older posts that came up in my forum search in which you were sharing the 360.
I know that is a very special piece and not what you’re referring to as an older, cheaper piece. A more reasonable one that a member here recently shared as his first PAM is the 390. But there are others to explore. I just need to be careful not to get su...
Yeah, 44mm is the sweet spot.
Even reps from other watch companies will tell you Panerai makes the most distinctive case in the industry. 44mm works perfectly on my 8 inch wrist. ...
🤩This GMT reminds me of my PAM 320, which was my first Panerai.
This has so many of the design features I still love, especially that iconic small seconds in combination with the ‘9’.
I’m still a 47mm lover
My wrist is only around 7” but at least to me, all of my 47mm Panerai’s are quite comfortable and certainly make a statement given their size. ...
44mm in luminor case works best for me.
I let go of the Pam 372 recently because it was just large on my wrist. Other than the 44mm luminors, I still have 45mm and 47mm Rad but they are not too overwhelming because of the slim wire lugs.
It’s funny, but I never tried on a wire-lugged Rad. It makes sense that the 47mm is more wearable.
45s also work great for me!
Very interesting post, my friend. For me, Panerai = Big. 47 mm is the natural size. When I tried a 47 mm Panerai for the first time, it was some 25 years ago, and it was a vintage.
I wasn't prepared to such a shock. Way too big, I was thinking! The,, in 2002, I tried the 127. Same feeling. BUT after one week, I felt it was ok on my wrist. got used to it. No, better, addict to it. So for me, 44 mm is good, and the new 5218 is a perfe...
These are very helpful thoughts and advice, thank you 🙏🏽
I had noticed an old post of yours dated Nov 6, 2022 which had a picture of most [but not all] of your PAMs and left me wondering what’s the size of them all. As advised, I will change the strap and wear less tightly to give another try. But I also think ...
Leave 00372......
Leave 00372 and enjoy it later. Forget it and after a year it will be fun again. If you are looking for 44mm go for it. As per my opinion and mine observation, 42mm it is good but no so good as 44mm. But my 42mm Submersible can compare to 45mm Radiomir be...
44mm has been introduced in 1993 and...
..when Panerai started selling watches to the public. I believe they are the back-bone of Panerai sales. I have a fair few of them (all older model, to be sure) and like them as much as the "historical" 47mm. Buy away Lolllllllll
Aymen, I completely understand your feelings and post!
I seem to have this love/hate relationship with the brand and currently in my love phase, let’s hope it lasts. Navy Seals edition ...
Exactly, a bit of a roller coaster experience…
but the attraction is never fully lost as we still come across a piece that has us pulling out the wallet again. Again, nothing matches the Panerai experience.
I bought a 372 when they came out. Loved it but as for most folks age eventually creates shrinkage. Off it went to a good buddy which allowed me to get my Moon to Mars Speedy back!
I replaced the 372 with a 44mm 590 and still love it. But I missed the 372s uncluttered look which landed me on the 562. Similar in a number of ways to the 372 but is also 44mm. Then at a watch party I saw the 0933. Finally a Radiomir in the collection, 4...
Well said, it is a personalized experience.
I must say, that 933 is killer, and perfect in your wrist💪🏽💪🏽 I’m a sucker for the small seconds and ‘9’ combination.
Although I really do like the 590 I'm a sucker for not losing any of the 4 numbers, blue dials, micro rotors and not having a date so at that party out came the plastic! ;-)
I have better pics of it but after looking for them an hour I gave up. It's a very special blue dial which isn't obvious in the wrist shot I offered up here.
