efftee
228
The SE vs non-SE Strategy
I read a blog story recently on how the most desired and valued watch brands, such as Patek Philippe and Rolex, do not rely on making/selling special edition watches. One could argue the supply of some PP complication pieces so exceed the demand that they might as well all be limited editions and some Daytonas being the watch that 'no one can get but everyone has'. I may be wrong, but other than the charity and Advanced Research pieces, PP and Rolex completely debunk the strategy of using SE watches to attract attention and/or drive sales.
On the flip(per) side (you decide if pun should be intended or not), brands like Panerai and Audemars Piguet depend heavily on SEs to make their sun shines. How many more SE ROOs for each regular-production ROOs model? When was the last time a non-SE Panerai caught our lustful eyes? I don't think there's anything necessarily wrong with this strategy per se; it's the brand's prerogative at the end of the day and it's impossible to please their customers -- the purists, neophytes and flippers too -- all at the same time.
What I think is 'wrong' (others may not subscribe to my point of view), with the 360 at least, is 'faking' patina. That kind of take the pride out of owning real T-dial watches. I used to think that making more Cali dials after the 249 was a little insulting too, but I've gotten over that. And not sure if jacking up the prices of watches on Minerva movements to the stratosphere is altogether right either. And I am not even going to open the can of worms on how SEs get from factory to owners!
Which brings me to why I think what Panerai is doing with the 372 (and 422) is so commendable. With the 000 and 005, I think these watches offer the Panerai DNA in its design, and in numbers and prices that cater to every one of its fans. Bravo. I sure hope Panerai continue to produce non-SEs in such calibre and, if they must continue making SEs, at least make them truly worthy to be 'Special'.