Bruno.M1
4159
my point of view
Nov 07, 2011,04:13 AM
This watch is only an 'inhouse' miammamia, personally I agree with those that expect Panerai to re-call those piece
- Maybe they will but would you send your Daytona with 'Patrizzi' dial back to Rolex to get a new white dial without this discolored error ? Or what about the cream Explorer
I'm sure there are a lot of these exceptions out there.
Does it make the watch more beautifull ? Better ? Worse ?
I don't know but I do know that collectors go crazy for stuff like that
Panerai used a dozen of other movements Valjoux, Lémania, Rolex, Angulus, Zenith, GP, JLC, Cézard, Piguet, ...all these movements were finished good. The JLC , Zenith and others didn't need many extra modifications because they were fine just the way they are. When they used entry level movements like the Unitas 6497 they changed quite a lot on these movements. From early 1993 till 1997. And after 1997 these used Unitas movements got other bridges, ( stamped Panerai wording or Geneva Stripes) , perlage, blued screws, bevelling,... Every single Unitas got a serious 'upgrade'
Except these 150 in the 318.
So yes, it is a shame that these 150 got sold with that piece of crap inside but it does make them very special, rare or call it whatever you like..
But I guess that like me you did not buy this watch, imagine how you would feel if you did.
Call me crazy but this could be a reason for me to buy one. And if they would ever want to switch it with an OP II I would refuse it. At the end we pay too much for such a watch anyway. I mean, this raw movement will cost a bit less than 100 euro. How much dou you think it would cost after Panerai modified this ébauche into an OP II ?? 200 ? 250 ? maybe 300 ? This makes a difference less than 200 euro on a 4 or 5 K watch. Whats the total production cost of a Rolex 116610 ? 1250 euro ? and these also sell for a price which is 5 times more.