Setting aside that one movement may be superior to another
movement as I am in no way qualified to make any comments or pass judgment.
Why is a Chanel leather belt $800-1000 dollars when a similar looking belt is
worth $50. They both hold up your pants. You might say the Brand
and the prestige associated with it. And that is exactly correct.
All I am saying is there is not right or wrong. It is our perceived value
of the item and the perceived value of the masses attribute to it and this is what drives the price/value
matrix. In Panerai's case most of the economics seem to be focused on
limiting supply but this argument get shattered in some instances like
the 127 example with 1950 psc. Even the 1000 psc 217 is climbing
fast. This compared to 150psc example with higher end movements.
If you look at the 127 and discounting the $6900 and starting with the last
retail price of $9k (06) even at $25k it is a little over double and the PreV
models at +/-$3k are selling at well over $30k a 10x increase. I do not
ever see the 127 reaching a 10x multiple. So fast forward to today fewer
will speculate on an Euro 18k watch doubling or tripling any time soon much taking the gamble at 18k
The 127 has some froth on it and has most likely peaked as have some of the
preV model. But factor the short supply of PreV you have a better chance
of the price remaining high with very little speculators.
I'll bet if you ask Panerai what business they are in there answer would be
broader than we sell watches. They would something a kin to Xerox
who would not say we make photo copiers but "We are in the office
automation industry" or a cosmetic firm that doesn’t say they make
skin creams but "We make people feel better about themselves."
So I think Panerai would have an answer closer to the cosmetics company. The real question though is how will the maintain the perceived notion that most Panerai watches maintain there value as the supply and prices increase steadily?
After writing all this realize I have imparted very little. Oh well.
Bill