It’s a difficult if not impossible dilemma.
I to know the story behind the Grönefeld brothers and I to have been tempted (and still are tempted).
What in the end made me hold back on the Grönefeld, (and I’m writing this with the utmost respect for the brothers) is the simple purely rationale issue of continuity risk.
I take my hat of for what the two have achieved, I really do.
But I couldn’t get over that burn8ng question: what happens if 10-15 years from now the watch needs repair. The remontoire mechanism is broken.
What are the odds the house still exists, what are the odds other watch makers can repair it?
It’s hypothetical I know. Yet logic dictates that the same risk with a Lange or VC or Patek simply is smaller.
That has been the only thing that’s been standing between me and a Grönefeld.
Will that last? Probably not because every time I read anything about Grönefeld my heart ticks faster. So one day, not today but tomorrow I will own one.
You wanted some honest advise, there is none.
But please, don’t make the mistake I made and have rationale win over passion because I made the right choice from risk reward point of view, yet I don’t have a Grönefeld in my safe nor on my wrist and one day I will have it.
To Tim and Bart: should you ever read this, I’m sure you remember me and trust me one day I’ll be at your doorstep to acquire one of your creations just don’t know when yet