Happy new year to everyone.
Before the end of the year, I was lucky enough to rediscover a piece that I've always been attracted to, even though it surprisingly (to me) elicits "eh, not bad..." from those around me whom I'm stupid enough to ask.
I've been mulling over a more detailed photo essay on this piece - about its moonphase; about the (to me) successful mash up of the Royal Oak and Nautilus aesthetics; about how easy it is to wear, especially it's lack of sharp or hard edges or corners (I just came off many months of the great Bulgari P10 piece, which practically speaking is almost the ideal watch, but it has many sharp or hard edges...that are unkind to cuffs, finger tips, etc); the easy to read and beautifully done big date; the very successful AR coating that seems to make the domed crystal disappear; the ever romantic (and yes, dare I say it? USEFUL) power reserve indicator...unjustly underappreciated, in my humble opinion...
Because it has been worn for periods of a few weeks, then put away for months and even years, I haven't obssessed about the fact that it is fast 15-25 seconds a day, crown up or crown down; better fast than slow, right?
And really, besides a general approximation of the current time, for this particular piece, the moonphas and RDM indicators are more important to me...
So today, I went out for a ride in the rare morning mists and low cloud covers of Southern California ...
When I got back, it was 45 minutes slow...
Hmmmm...
(for the techno-geeks among you, though the engine is a big 500 cc four stroke engine, the vibrations and noise are fairly minimal, it has a CVT transmission that is fairly smooth, and the suspension is, again, fairly soft and smooth.)
Cheers,
TM


