
What do the following things have in common? Omega Speedmaster. Porsche 911. Rolex Submariner. Audemars Royal Oak. Patek Philippe Nautilus. Jaeger LeCoultre Reverso. There are, to my mind, some defined links between them. Design icons of the 1950-70s era. Yes, this era has more than its fair share o

Joe, The Speedmaster and the Submariner should be, IMHO, present on all lists. The Reverso, I believe that JLC somehow diluted the icon on so many versions. The classic two hands, hand wound, is the icon. Others, I don't know. Never had, or plan to have, one. One point to note: Discussing the Speedmaster with the local Omega Boutique team, they stated that the first watch that a customer asks those is not the Speedmaster but the Seamaster Bond. Did Omega has with the Seamaster Bond another icon?
I totally agree in your train of thoughts. But as always, there is a but.... BUT, the Reverso belongs to the 1930s era and was produced all the way into the 1940s. The number of Reverso produced during 1950s - 1970s, is is basically zero as it re-emurged only in the 1980s. Best Blomman
......i am really thinking more along the lines of a concept as the bigger picture. But yes, the reverso is from a different era.
My feeling is that for anything to obtain the status of icon it must be instantly recognisable outside its particular niche. So I agree with your mention of VW Beetle or Porsche 911 as icons from a motoring perspective and which are recognised by people who have no interest in cars. With watches however I think there are very few that meet my personal definition of icon. By that I mean that they should be instantly familiar with people who have little interest in watches. In fact, I would say th
I agree with all points but would like to add under Patek Philippe: Grand Complications. Best, Kari
Replace them with Cartier Tank?
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 21 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →