By virtue of being a direct response to the Royal Oak and Nautilus, it is a pretender.
But the Nautilus was one a pretender too. Now it is the darling.
To me, the Lange dial is successful. The case and bracelet are quirky, but not bad. I’m interested in learning more about it. I cannot say if it is at the level of icon, but it is fighting an uphill battle against competitors with strong marketing.
I suspect it will fail to become the leader here, because of marketing. Is Lange able and willing to do what it takes to get the Odysseus on the wrists of the people hitting up bottle service in Miami? It is a feedback loop. Success amongst non-watch people will drive demand for watch and non-watch people, many of whom will desire the watch just because it is not easy to obtain. This is important for me too - if it’s hard to get, you appreciate it more.
To get there will take time and unyielding support for the model. As soon as the Odysseus is heavily revised, the clock is reset. The Nautilus was a follower to the Royal Oak for almost 40 years, only recently stepping out of its shadow.
At the very least, the Odysseus must make it through two decades without being replaced and without major revisions. This is where the Vacheron 222 and Overseas fell short. Odds are against this model too. If Richemont is practicing optimal strategy, then it is probable that the Odysseus will give way to the Odysseus 2.0, rather than mature into the Odysseus 1.1.