bernard cheong
7182
I mean no malice. This post is meant to inspire some thoughts.
From both industry, designers, customers and mainly people who buy something of BOTH relevance and beauty (ugliness is part of the same coin).
Thanks Thomas for understanding.
Your friend,
Bernard
This message has been edited by bernard cheong on 2010-03-25 10:58:59
Thanks hugely Bernard...
By: pplater : March 24th, 2010-03:14
... thank you, thank you, thank you for a wonderful 'stream of consciousness' report which offers some genuinely interesting and authoritative insights from 'behind the curtain'. (Unusually perhaps): we will have to agree to disagree about Arpa though! Ch...
"Arpa vision"...
By: pplater : March 24th, 2010-09:48
.... isn't that an oxymoron? This is not intended to offend those who admire his body of work - watches made from the steel of the Titanic; watches with two tourbillons incapable of telling the time; now watches made of dino dung. Rather, it is intended t...
I like it.
By: pjbocean : March 24th, 2010-11:04
in all its rough form. Let me know if you get board with it. I agree with many of your thoughts. I have made similiar comments as I am weary of remakes by many brands. So many brands are looking backwards instead of forward- although in the case of Zenith...
Hi Bernard
By: 41northpole : March 24th, 2010-03:52
Maybe post of the year !! Certainly seems the Swiss don't understand many markets at the moment, not only with product, but also price. I'm in the UK and pretty much every time you pass by a watch window the prices have gone up. Okay, Sterling isn't doing...
Marcus, I agree...
By: ThomasM : March 24th, 2010-10:13
Hi, Marcus, Hopefully twenty minutes of typing won't go "up in smoke" this time. Thanks for the "counterpoint" to Bernard's iconoclasm - internet communities tend to love to cheer "new society" and embrace technology and the shifting of the socio-econo-po...
Survivability of a company
By: ArthurSG : March 24th, 2010-20:20
Is more a function of its business model (amongst many other things) and while I see what you’re saying and it’s very helpful from a servicing point of view if companies are still around in 20 years, I’m just wondering from a collectors’ point of view, is...
aw crap.
By: ThomasM : March 24th, 2010-09:57
Hi, Bernard, That was NOT a play on the Artya watch thing... I just wrote 500 words ripping the generally haughty and arrogant culture that has become VC (with all due respect to friends like Alex Ghotbi and Christian Selmonyi) as well as commenting on th...
All it needs is a date indicator...
By: chaser579 : March 24th, 2010-10:56
and a chronograph function, EOT, moonphase/age of moon cycle, GMT indicator, and reserve de marche (power reserve indicator, not a marching band), and, oh, a sonnerie of course, and I'd wear it. Coolness. Or crapness, whatever! Thanks, my LOL! for da day ...
A Surprise
By: Heinrich : March 24th, 2010-12:38
I was quited surprised to read a post on this forum which issues such kind of criticism regarding the watch business. From my point of view this criticism seems very biased. There may well be an incredible amount of new money waiting to be earned by horol...
Some statistics...As
By: sidneyc : March 24th, 2010-17:00
As I mentioned previously in another thread. China accounts for nearly a third of Swiss watch exports, and China + Singapore accounts for almost 40% (Source: Financial Times, March 19 2010). I do agree with Bernard that if there are still people in the wa...
Kudos
By: Cookies : March 24th, 2010-21:59
Those are moving words,and am sure many here await your engaging intellectual posts.Actually,I like the Dino poo version watches,and similarly but sadly, the decline and inaccessibility of JD puts me back on the exotic material dial versions.
So you think...
By: cen@jkt : March 25th, 2010-11:17
my fabolous rolex leopard watch is ugly? At least it's adorned with magnificent and glorious precious stones along with wondrous movement inside. And most importantly, it ain't got no shit on the dial cen@maldives (working of course!)