.... isn't that an oxymoron?
This is not intended to offend those who admire his body of work - watches made from the steel of the Titanic; watches with two tourbillons incapable of telling the time; now watches made of dino dung. Rather, it is intended to ask, genuinely - is he a 'prophet or a fool'? A neo-vanguardist or a cynical capitalist?
His designs evoke particular works of the past:
Rauschenberg's 'White paintings" -
Cage's 4'33" -
Duchamp's "Fountain" -
Is there a common theme, or a vast difference? Is Arpa's work controversially deconstructing an ageing and stuffy paradigm or is it controversy for the sake of controversy?
No doubt, it would be refreshing if watch houses - 'brands' - would cease pandering to the mystical mega-wealthy patron: is this, though, the direction that they have to follow when they do?
Cheers,
pplater.


