ianny
1888
AP Royal Oak 15300
Am I the only one who prefers this to the RO 15400? The dial layout is more balanced, and the movement is not “undersized.”
Best,
Ian
Collection
Discover why the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15300 is a collector's favorite, offering ideal proportions and design compared to the 15202 and 15400. Read owner experiences and market insights.
32 replies7044 views
New Release
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 40th Anniversary: Amanico reviews the 15202, 15400, and skeleton models from SIHH 2012. Explore design evolution and collector insights.
45 replies12266 views
Collection
Struggling to find an Audemars Piguet Royal Oak for a small wrist? Explore collector experiences with 15202, 15450, and 39mm Chrono models for the perfect fit.
28 replies40067 views
Community
MichaelC reviews the Audemars Piguet forum's 2014 highlights: new acquisitions, releases like the 15202 Royal Oak, and community growth.
35 replies17572 views
AP Royal Oak 15300
Am I the only one who prefers this to the RO 15400? The dial layout is more balanced, and the movement is not “undersized.” Best, Ian ...
I’m with You
I used to have both 15300 and later 15400. 15300 is more balanced generally. But I still prefer dial layout of 15400. 15300 with - a bit smaller dial/hands of 15400 would be perfect. 15400 movement is too small for its case. Overall I would go for 15300, ...
Another reason for preferring the 15300 ..
is because i have a small wrist. Best, Ian
15300
I looked at both in that transition period between the two versions. Preferred the 15300 and then unexpectedly found one with a blue dial. A keeper.
