ChetBaker
1094
That is what I’m thinking. I would trade up a chnr in a heartbeat if the 1675 is pristine and original.
Modern rolex are a dime a dozen and frankly the modern gmt’s leave me cold. But: very personal choice.
Should I do this? Would you do it?
Trade my CHNR for 1675. [Updated to include picture on the Front page — FabR] ...
I’m with you Nico. It’s a Modern Rootbeer isn’t it????
I’m not up with the kids. But I am nearly 50 you know 😜😜. My 50th watch coming soon. M.
Chocolat/Noir
I would keep the CHNR (Root Beer) vs the 1675. For a Daytona, that's a different situation!
Depends on what pulls at your heartstrings more.
They are such different watches, that they may as well be from different brands. The four digit is very tool-watchy. The CHNR is very pretty and finely-finished, not to mention the extra tech in the movement. I pity you for being in such a conundrum
This is the only question that matters.
Please show us a picture of the particular watch.
That is what I’m thinking. I would trade up a chnr in a heartbeat if the 1675 is pristine and original.
Modern rolex are a dime a dozen and frankly the modern gmt’s leave me cold. But: very personal choice.
This is a much too personal and subjective decision. Whatever really sings to you should be the deciding factor...
..however, I love the Oystersteel Everose 126711CHNR
No way
I think it’s easy for some to wax poetic about these heavily used vintage Subs, but at the end of the day with this trade, you’re left with a rattletrap and stretched bracelet with a cheap stamped clasp, on a watch head that is likely over polished and a ...
I'd keep the modern Rootbeer
I think it’s a great watch and the rose gold makes it a special watch to me. But if I had to choose between my Rootbeer and 1675 it would be tough. M.
