beejo
1303
Thanks Joe,That’s outstanding
We don’t get this kind of posts a lot here,But I am counting on you for more to come.
You actually made me fall for the 1019.The 1665 and 1675 have been on my list for a long time already but now I have three on my Rolex list.The navigator is making my life harder 😄
Best,
Ahmed
"Just Three Watches" for Vintage Rolex
Going from modern to vintage is not so easy. Picking three Rolex from the current listed watches was not as hard as I thought it might be. Going through the same process for vintage Rolex has proven much harder. Firstly, should I use the same criteria for...
Thanks Claes.....
.....the really interesting stuff is in the attached reviews Cheers
Genuinely.....
......i get the tip of the iceberg. Subs? Not many on this planet who know more than Bill. GMT? Not many who know more than Nicolas. I did research on watches I owned.....a very small universe
Brilliant post dear friend...brilliant!!!!
Perfect choices! What to say in the end aside quoting part of one of your sentences "mystery and romance"...two things I greatly appreciate in world of horology and your posts! Yours D
Thanks Baron for this post! Rolex is just fascinating.
The diversity is so great and the consistent quality of the output over the decades has stood out. If I could have only 1 vintage Rolex (from both your eras), it would come down to a choice between the PN Daytona and the 6542 GMT and if we exclude any tho...
The post1966 selection is a complement of the pre 1966 selection.
There are indisputable must have in your selections, the names being GMT MASTER, Submariner / Seadweller, Milgauss, Expolrer and Daytona. It is impossible for me to give only three references, while I am able to give four or five. For example, I agree wit...
So basically we are pretty close....
....though i see Tudor as a seperate category altogether. In fact very close overall.
Joe, you have nailed it again with this fantastic post
One thing Pre 1966- why only stick to Sports watches So many lovely old chronos, bubble back and other interesting model eg Prince- maybe for another post- Pre 1966 but non sports models? Thanks again for all the hard work J
of course, you are right......
.....and that opens a whole new can of worms. It makes total sense to include a Prince.....diversity, personality, something very different, importance to the brand. But what would I leave out....aggghhh.
What a post..
And a mind bender.. not to mention educational (as opposed to just being informative). My set would be a bit more “pedestrian”. Mostly post 66 for me. Sure a PN is a logical choice but I’m willing to drop THE icon for your 1019. Wouldn’t even think twice....
Nice responses Echi....
.....obviously there is no right or wrong, but just a prompt to play. 1019, like you, needs a place in there....somewhere. I also have a lot of time for the 1675. In fact, within my collection I went to keep a 1675 over a 6542....but thats an altogether d...
Thanks Joe,That’s outstanding
We don’t get this kind of posts a lot here,But I am counting on you for more to come. You actually made me fall for the 1019.The 1665 and 1675 have been on my list for a long time already but now I have three on my Rolex navigator is making my life harde...
The 1019 is one of my favourite Rolex pieces......it has something beyond what it seems
It took me ages to find one....and it came late in my collecting, but its one I will always keep.
This vintage Rolex
Has something to it,A charm that’s hard to find these days in the more practical,Technically superior ceramic ’t get me wrong I don’t hate the modern models but there is always something special about a vintage Ferrari GT250 SWB,Although it’s not superior...
Well, the 1019 has always been a love of mine.
And GMT’s....how can you not love them? For me the top Rolex are: GMT, Milgauss and Explorer.