Normally i am not a big fan of the Daytona. Not sure why as it just does not trigger much for me…with the exception of this one! In platinum, with this color combo, humm, WOW
I guess i would have to feel it in the flesh. I thought it weight close to 500gr, maybe i am wrong! This is an issue for me for example for photography as even if I have a "small" Sony camera (I have the A1), as soone as I put a heavy prime of it (like a ...
Initially, I found the colour scheme comically ugly, but after having seen a couple in the wild I consider it works. And having a platinum Rolex on the wrist tends to affect one's perspective anyways. I hence vote in favour!
...that it would be hard to choose, assuming one could actually purchase one. I particularly love the Daytonaa in yellow gold with the flex bracelet. I'm afraid (besides the price) the platinum version might be a bit too hefty.
And being a complicated watch fan and Daytona fan it was a must have. Then add in the fact that this was the 50th Anniversary model and the want no need grew even more within me. I was then very lucky with a local AD who had it for 12 months and could not...
I too could not get past the brown, black and I would have owned one awhile back. I passed on this watch at $50K about 5 years ago, woops! The WG with dark blue is spectacular.
I wonder why Rolex thinks a lighter brown bezel and subdials is better than the more common dark brown....? I think Rolex are becoming 'playful' in their middle-age?