Rolex

So, there’s a choice today. You can have one of these, 16520, steel case with either the black or white dial OR you could have a modern precious metal (not PT) Daytona. What do you do? And a second question, if you already had the below watch would you ad...  

I have the SS 116520 White and Black dial pair. So I may be a little biased.

The pair would be nice, assuming I could find a good one. But I’m still a little tempted by the modern Oysterflex as it gives you something different.

The 16520 Zenith and the new ceramic bezel Daytona in steel. As I get a bit older I find the legibility of the white dials a bit better. Given where pricing and value sits today, I’ve been tempted to cash in and get myself another PP or FPJ time only piec... 

It’s THE chronograph in my opinion. The two whites are a nice pair.

...  

The only reasons I’m thinking about the newer Daytona is 1) to have a WG or RG and/or 2) the Oysterflex.

I am certain if I was to add another steel it would only be the 16520 White.

16520 A-series But to be honest: i could not decide between black or white dial ...  

I would like to own, but i am not sure if i would trade for a 16520 Picture credit: ...  

Premium.

This is the current “this or that” dilemma.

The white 16520 is still one of the best looking Daytonas ever, for me. If you ask me about modern Daytonas, the WG Oysterflex has no rival. Vte

Overall, I think the WG is the best looking of the bunch, and most versatile. However, the Oysterflex also allows one to go coloured gold while still not catching everyone’s eyes.

and in Rolex chrono I stop at the 5 digits ... ...  

Also, I do own a black 16520 and would much prefer acquiring a white one to complement it over a current WG or RG Daytona. Which is kind of what I did, except that it is a white 116520. To be more precise: I acquired the white 116520 in 2010, and the blac... 

...  

So it’s interesting that this is what I started out wanting, the WG. However I’m now leaning more toward the RG Oysterflex.