A few thoughts..

Jun 11, 2020,05:43 AM
 

First, very nice watch. I am not a Rolex guy, but the “Batman” is one of the few I find pleasing.


That being said, perhaps it just needs to settle in a bit?

Also, it is my understanding that watches tend to run fast as the mainspring is nearer to the end; and that automatic watches keep the best time when the mainspring stays almost fully wound.  Perhaps, if you have been less active lately, the watch isn’t staying as fully wound as normal and is running a second or two per day out of spec?

And at one point in time I saw in an old Rolex manual that minor adjustments in rate can be made by storing the watch overnight in various positions. Maybe give that a try?

If it is stable, I think +3.86/day is very good!  I be very happy if any of my watches achieved that rate.

 Enjoy wearing your Rolex.


More posts: 116710batmanGMT Master II

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Superlative Chronometer...no more.

 
 By: Lankysudanese : June 11th, 2020-05:25
This is a rant, so please feel free to ignore if (like most of us) you are here for some positive post-COVID-lockdown news. I just received my first generation batman after I had sent it to geneva headquarters >4months ago for superlative regulation. And ...  

A few thoughts..

 
 By: LS : June 11th, 2020-05:43
First, very nice watch. I am not a Rolex guy, but the “Batman” is one of the few I find pleasing. That being said, perhaps it just needs to settle in a bit? Also, it is my understanding that watches tend to run fast as the mainspring is nearer to the end;... 

👍🏿 [nt]

 
 By: Lankysudanese : June 11th, 2020-06:35

The real question is..

 
 By: myles721 : June 11th, 2020-06:24
Why did you buy a Rolex? If it was to own a Rolex who cares about 3.5 seconds a day...if it was to own a consistent timepiece there are other brands in the category that have IMO better movements.

Ok😀...

 
 By: myles721 : June 11th, 2020-07:59
Omega Seamaster PO. Blancpain 50 Fathoms GP Nighthawk ...  

All too big, or else I would have all 3 in my stable.

 
 By: Lankysudanese : June 11th, 2020-08:14
You better believe that I’ve emailed Blancpain to offer a modern FF in a historically accurate 42mm😂😂

Or for a GMT

 
 By: myles721 : June 11th, 2020-08:10
...  

Touché (apart from the size).

 
 By: Lankysudanese : June 11th, 2020-08:17
You have great taste

So do you

 
 By: myles721 : June 11th, 2020-08:19
😉

Personally I've always felt if you want perfect timing buy a quartz. The fetish for mechanical watches to be within a few seconds a day never was my thing.

 
 By: Blansky : June 11th, 2020-06:25
Really, what is the correct time anyways. Enjoy the beautiful watch and forget about perfect time. And what are you timing it against. Hopefully not a cell phone?

Your opinion is shared by many in the watch community, and I respect that. I just don’t subscribe to it.

 
 By: Lankysudanese : June 11th, 2020-06:33
I’m timing it with an atomic clock app. FYI: my AP RO never claimed superlative chronometry and it still made ‘the cut’ in terms of ending in my collection. Was I happily-surprised with the stable plus 3.5 seconds per day of the caliber 3120? Absolutely ... 

I realize there are people who demand complete accuracy and that's fine.

 
 By: Blansky : June 11th, 2020-07:40
It's just too bad that every time you look at your beautiful watch you are disappointed. That's my point. Due to a couple of seconds a day, you lost your love of your watch. For me it's never an issue partly because I change watches every 4 days. So it's ... 

I share your point regarding accuracy!

 
 By: ZSHSZ : June 11th, 2020-07:26
As I previously shared my parallel, if John Harrison was able to make in 1761 a marine chronometer that run at 1s/month, with today’s technology we should at least match that. So The Batman is my all time favorite of all watches that I ever handled in my ...  

My Datejust 36mm 126200...

 
 By: Boris : June 11th, 2020-07:49
... bought brand new last year has never run the advertized \-2 secs per day. It has always consistently been at 3.5 secs per day. Which is not bad in my book, but not at the advertized level. I think this is mostly marketing, to be honest.

I have never

 
 By: baufoam : June 11th, 2020-07:55
had a Rolex or a Patek Philippe keep consistent time within the rates that they claim are to be expected. I love my Rolex and Patek Philippe timepieces, but at their best they keep “good “ time. Nothing within the claim in the advertising.

Rolex are the marketing kings.

 
 By: Lankysudanese : June 11th, 2020-07:58
For whatever reason, my precious sub-no-date ran plus 0.5s/day for 4-5 years, until I was forced to sell it 😔

Get the tools and regulate yourself!

 
 By: roundel : June 11th, 2020-11:11
Regulating watches is not rocket science usually. I have only cracked open a few of my watches to make adjustments, but it is frequently fun and rewarding. My 5002 Big Pilot was a great success that I got down to a fraction of a second a day through trial... 

That is the spirit!

 
 By: Lankysudanese : June 11th, 2020-11:50
BTW: what kind of apps listen to watches tick to calculate the rate?

Hairspring

 
 By: roundel : June 11th, 2020-11:55
I use Hairspring. It uses my iphones speaker. There needs to be very little ambient noise, but it is a fun app.

Sorry

 
 By: roundel : June 11th, 2020-14:46
I tried to look it up and it appears to be NLA. I cannot comment on the quality of the current options in the App Store.