rcg412
140
My take
Is it looks well polished, and I’m not sure the buckle is right (that’s minor) But otherwise it looks ok. It is not a first series, but an early second series.
Opinions on this 3940J
By: Anirudh : December 10th, 2017-03:33
Hope everyone is having a wonderful first weekend of the last month of 2017! Contemplating a new purchase and this is going to be my first PC. How does the case/ dial etc look to your keen eyes? This particular example comes out of China. A flat PP box is...
Thoughts
By: Anirudh : December 10th, 2017-08:15
I realize having B&P is great. But considering the age of the watch, and the fact that one can get an EOA from PP, would it make that much of a difference? Sure, on a newer reference, like the 5711 I purchased not long ago, I insisted on the entire se...
Ok
By: Baron - Mr Red : December 10th, 2017-09:08
So you have a vintage watch that has absolutely no paperwork at all. The extracts cost very little to buy and can be done quite quickly. One would need to ask why the seller had not done this? For me, that is odd. You say the watch is priced very well. Uh...
Agree with Mr. Red
By: U3O8 : December 11th, 2017-07:38
Case looks polished and edges seem soft. I have a 3940J. Mine has hallmarks on the lugs. I don't see any here. Also, does anybody know where in the production run the watch was sold with a deployment clasp? If and when you decided to put a deployment clas...
3940j is a true classic,
By: Mech : December 11th, 2017-00:53
I missed mine! Why not bring it to PP and have it checked? If they come back good, then I would worry less about the B&P if the price has factored these missing items, unless you intend to resell it and the future buyer might insist on them. Good luck. Me...
Extract
By: Anirudh : December 14th, 2017-10:18
I do have a picture of the extract as well and the movement number matches as mentioned in it. The Extract however states that the model is a 3940J. The seller does not have the solid caseback