markkeenan
400
If you had to get one of these - which would it be?
The Patek Aquanaut 5167
The Richard Mille RM010 in Titanium
Although I like the RM - Feel that the Vaucher movement is a little too simple to justify the price (perhaps also true of the Aquanaut), but I do feel (with absolutely no grounds whatsoever, and perhaps its just because it's a patek) that the cal 324 is a "better movement" in terms of accuracy and finish
I realise the enormous price difference between the two - but would only be considering the RM010 second hand
Grateful for all you opinions
Apologies for the aweful pictures
MK
If you had to get one of these - which would it be?
The Patek Aquanaut 5167 The Richard Mille RM010 in Titanium Although I like the RM - Feel that the Vaucher movement is a little too simple to justify the price (perhaps also true of the Aquanaut), but I do feel (with absolutely no grounds whatsoever, and ...
RM010
Not the best picture (RM's always look better in the flesh) and the white gold is nicer than the TI IMO. The 5167, whilst not hideous, is certainly an ugly watch. Try both on and they're so different, one will speak to you more than the other
Between the 2, My pick is also RM
I prefer RM010 Ti or (I owned) RM005FM. To me the Nautilus or Aquant are ugly watches. My favorite simple PP is 5124G or 5196P
My wife innocent comments
My wife thinks RM is ugly and look cheap. AP ROO looks better if you want a big watch.
