
Poky shares a cautionary tale about the refurbishment of his Patek Philippe Aquanaut Ref. 5167, highlighting the risks of over-polishing during service. His experience underscores the importance of maintaining original case integrity and the high expectations collectors have for factory service, especially from a brand like Patek Philippe.




Patek Philippe Aquanaut Reference 5167
The Reference 5167 represents the 40mm stainless steel iteration within Patek Philippe's Aquanaut model line. Introduced in 2007 and remaining in current production, this reference features a black dial and establishes the standard sizing for the steel Aquanaut offering.
The 40mm stainless steel case houses the automatic Caliber 324 S C movement, providing 45 hours of power reserve. The watch incorporates a sapphire crystal and smooth bezel configuration. Water resistance extends to 120 meters, while the distinctive composite rubber strap displays an embossed check pattern that complements the case design.
This reference appeals to collectors seeking contemporary Patek Philippe sports watch execution in stainless steel. The 5167 offers entry into the Aquanaut model range while maintaining the manufacturing standards associated with the Geneva manufacture. Its ongoing production status ensures availability through authorized channels for both new collectors and those expanding existing collections.
You can see without ... Bad work.
Personally I would not risk a second round of polishing as again you remove material. I realize it is a major disappointment and you should draw it to their attention but.... I guess the lesson we learn as that unless your case has be abused it is not worth the risk of a refinish. If it was full of nicks and dings and it came back as yours you would be satisfied. But light wear as you described and your expectations was a light touch up - for me too risky. Please let us know the conclusion. Bill
Wow. That is utterly disappointing. I feel for you.
Too many watches to service at PP?
That's very disappointing. Best, martin
and the resulting over-polishing was done to hide the error. I would send it back to Patek to fix as best they can.
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 72 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →